Specialized LLM Token Prediction for Human Intervention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing large language models (LLMs) lack the ability to recognize when external intervention, such as human assistance, is necessary to adequately respond to task-oriented prompts, leading to the generation of incorrect and misleading responses.

Innovation Solution

Training LLMs to predict specialized tokens, including action, speaker, and time tokens, to determine when external intervention is required, pausing response generation and requesting human assistance as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If LLM generates text-based responses automatically without external intervention, then response speed is improved, but response accuracy and reliability deteriorate for task-oriented prompts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidresponse accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The LLM predicts action tokens in advance to identify when external intervention is needed before generating the final response. This preliminary detection mechanism allows the system to pause and seek external assistance proactively, ensuring task completion before response generation, thereby maintaining both speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the LLM's predicted action tokens trigger external intervention signals. The external system processes the task and feeds back the completion status to the LLM, which then generates the final response. This feedback mechanism ensures accuracy while maintaining overall response efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If LLM pauses to seek external intervention for every task, then response accuracy is improved, but response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The LLM uses partial action by predicting action tokens selectively rather than pausing for every possible task. The model identifies specific scenarios where external intervention is critically needed based on its training, seeking assistance only when necessary. This partial intervention approach maintains accuracy for critical tasks while minimizing unnecessary delays for routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If LLM is trained with specialized action tokens, then ability to recognize when intervention is needed is improved, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintervention recognition capabilityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The action token mechanism serves multiple functions: it identifies when external intervention is needed, communicates this need to external systems, and guides the response generation process. This single multi-functional mechanism enhances adaptability without requiring separate complex subsystems for each function, thereby limiting the increase in overall model complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250238615A1Specialized token prediction by a large language model to prompt external intervention
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 INTUIT INC
  • US20250238615A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238615A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238615A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain aspects of the disclosure provide methods for training and using large language models (LLMs) to predict specialized tokens for prompting human intervention. A method generally includes obtaining a plurality of training data instances, each including: a training input comprising a first timestamp and a prompt and/or an intermediate response to the prompt; and a training output comprising a second timestamp and a response; annotating the training output of one or more training data instances to include an action token indicating that external intervention is required, wherein the annotation, for each training data instance, is based on: a time difference between the second timestamp and the first timestamp; a number of words included in the response; or at least one trigger word included in the response; and training the LLM on the training data instances to predict when external intervention is required and accordingly generate the action token.