Specialized Microbots for Contact Center Virtual Agents

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Monolithic virtual agents in contact centers are expensive to create and maintain, complex to troubleshoot, and inefficient due to their attempt to perform all functions, leading to high resource usage and difficulty in scaling.

Innovation Solution

Implementing specialized virtual agents with modular designs that can be easily created, tested, and maintained, each handling specific interactions and leveraging public cloud services, allowing for cost-effective deployment and efficient resource utilization by leveraging economies of scale.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If monolithic virtual agents are used to perform all functions, then versatility is improved, but device complexity and ease of manufacture deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidcode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monolithic virtual agent into multiple specialized microbots, each handling specific tasks or domains. This segmentation reduces code complexity by creating modular, independent components while maintaining overall system versatility through their collective capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal agent framework that can invoke multiple specialized microbots. This universal layer provides the multi-functionality needed to handle diverse customer interactions while delegating specific functions to specialized agents, avoiding the complexity of a single monolithic agent trying to do everything.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If monolithic virtual agents attempt to cover all functions, then adaptability is improved, but ease of repair and manufacturing precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional coverageVSAvoidmaintenance difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the agent system into independent microbots, each with specific functionality, the patent enables easier maintenance and repair. Individual microbots can be updated, fixed, or replaced without affecting the entire system, unlike a monolithic agent where changes risk introducing system-wide errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the universal agent automatically selects and invokes appropriate microbots based on customer needs. This automated routing reduces the need for manual intervention in managing functional coverage while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If monolithic virtual agents are deployed with all functionality available, then adaptability is improved, but use of energy and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional availabilityVSAvoidcomputing resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments computing resources by deploying only the specific microbots needed for each customer interaction. This avoids the overhead of maintaining and executing all possible functions simultaneously, reducing CPU, memory, and data storage usage while keeping all functionalities available on-demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by activating only the necessary microbots for each specific customer query rather than deploying all functionalities. This selective activation reduces resource consumption while maintaining the ability to provide comprehensive service when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of manufacture

If specialized virtual agents are used for specific tasks, then ease of manufacture is improved, but device complexity in terms of system architecture worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecreation easeVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a universal agent as an intermediary layer that manages the complexity of coordinating multiple specialized microbots. This mediator simplifies the system architecture by providing a single point of entry for customer interactions while handling the complexity of selecting and managing specialized agents behind the scenes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240223706A1Specialized Microbots in Contact Centers
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 AVAYA MANAGEMENT LP
  • US20240223706A1 patent drawing
  • US20240223706A1 patent drawing
  • US20240223706A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Large monolithic virtual agents attempt to provide all skills and abilities in a contact center in order to resolve a work item (call) from a customer. However, as the issues become more complex this paradigm results in errors, inefficiencies and knowledge shortcomings on the information and data they have been trained with. Accordingly, systems and methods are provided that enable a number of individual specialized virtual agents, working together, to be deployed. Each has a finite set of abilities and a communication may be transferred to the particular specialized virtual agent having the ability required to resolve a work item. A discovery service is provided to enable an agent to identify particular specialized virtual agent(s) having the required ability in order to resolve the work item, part of the work item or multiple work items.