Specific Hopping Patterns for Interference-Resilient Data Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data transmission systems using time and/or frequency hopping patterns face reduced interference immunity when multiple nodes use the same patterns, leading to overlapping transmissions that can cancel each other out, and inefficiencies due to uniform pattern usage and quartz tolerance variations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing individual hopping patterns for each data transmitter and receiver, which are derived from operating parameters such as addressing information, radio cell, geographical location, QoS requirements, quartz tolerance, and energy availability, to reduce interference and optimize frequency usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multiple nodes use the same global time and frequency hopping pattern for data transmission, then the system maintains simplicity in pattern definition and synchronization, but the interference immunity is reduced and transmission reliability deteriorates due to overlapping transmissions that can cancel each other out

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity in pattern definition and synchronizationVSAvoidinterference immunity and transmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the single global hopping pattern into multiple individual hopping patterns, one for each transmitter. Each pattern is derived from a unique identifier (such as transmitter ID or addressing information), thereby dividing the unified pattern space into node-specific patterns that reduce collisions while maintaining systematic generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by making each hopping pattern specific to a particular transmitter's local characteristics (unique identifier, addressing information). This ensures that each node uses a hopping pattern tailored to its identity, reducing the probability of pattern collisions with other nodes while maintaining overall system coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If individual hopping patterns are generated for each transmitter based on unique identifiers, then interference immunity is improved and pattern collisions are reduced, but the device complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference immunityVSAvoiddevice complexity and computational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for pattern generation from a single global seed to node-specific parameters such as transmitter ID, addressing information, or other unique identifiers. This parameter change enables individual pattern generation without requiring complex algorithms, as the patterns are derived systematically from the available identifier parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by enabling each transmitter to autonomously generate its own hopping pattern using its unique identifier. This eliminates the need for centralized pattern distribution or complex coordination protocols, as each node independently derives its pattern from its own identifying parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If a uniform hopping pattern is used across all nodes, then the network capacity is limited due to pattern collisions, but the system maintains lower complexity in pattern management and synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidpattern management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics by making the hopping pattern adaptable to each transmitter's characteristics. Instead of a static uniform pattern, the system dynamically assigns or derives patterns based on node identifiers, allowing the network to scale capacity as nodes are added while maintaining pattern uniqueness through systematic derivation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3610575B1Specific hopping patterns for telegram splitting
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV
  • EP3610575B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3610575B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3610575B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In exemplary embodiments, data transmitters and the data receiver use an individual hopping pattern for communication instead of a uniform (global) hopping pattern that is used in the same way by all data transmitters and data receivers in a communications system. Said individual hopping pattern can be dependent on an operating parameter and is thus used exclusively by the data transmitter and the data receiver or by a small group of data transmitters and/or data receivers, thereby making it possible to significantly increase immunity to disturbances.