Specimen Fatigue Testing With Progressive Loads and Deformation Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fatigue limit testing methods are slow, expensive, and prone to inconsistent results due to the need for multiple specimens, high-precision equipment, and sensitivity to external factors, making them costly and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A method involving successive test blocks with increasing cyclic load amplitudes and alternating deformation tests to characterize fatigue behavior, using regular equipment and measuring deformation variations to determine the fatigue limit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fatigue limit testing methods are used with multiple specimens tested at high number of cycles, then the fatigue limit can be determined, but the testing time becomes very long and the cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue limit determinationVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The test is divided into multiple test blocks with increasing cyclic load amplitudes, where each block contains a specific number of cycles. This segmentation allows the specimen to be progressively loaded rather than requiring continuous high-cycle testing, significantly reducing total test time while maintaining accuracy in fatigue limit determination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Deformation tests are performed periodically between successive test blocks to monitor fatigue damage accumulation. This periodic measurement approach enables tracking of specimen degradation over time without requiring continuous high-precision measurement equipment throughout the entire test duration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If multiple specimens are used to determine the fatigue limit, then statistical reliability is improved, but the manufacturing cost and testing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefatigue limit characterizationVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The test adapts dynamically by adjusting the cyclic load amplitude in successive test blocks based on specimen response. This dynamic loading approach allows a single specimen to provide sufficient data for reliable fatigue limit characterization, eliminating the need for multiple specimens while maintaining statistical validity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Deformation measurements taken between test blocks provide feedback on the specimen's fatigue damage state. This feedback mechanism allows real-time assessment of specimen condition, enabling reliable fatigue limit determination from a single specimen through progressive loading rather than requiring multiple parallel tests

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If high precision equipment is used to measure deformation during cyclic loading, then measurement accuracy is improved, but equipment cost and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation measurementVSAvoidequipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Deformation tests are performed in advance between load blocks rather than continuously during cyclic loading. This preliminary and periodic measurement approach allows use of simpler measurement equipment since high-precision continuous monitoring is not required, reducing equipment complexity and cost while maintaining adequate measurement accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The deformation measurement function is extracted from the continuous cyclic loading process and performed as separate, isolated tests between load blocks. This separation allows use of standard testing equipment rather than specialized high-precision measurement systems, simplifying the overall test setup while maintaining measurement validity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If thermography is used to measure heating during cyclic loading, then fatigue damage can be monitored in accelerated manner, but equipment cost and sensitivity requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting speedVSAvoidthermography equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces thermal measurement (thermography) with mechanical deformation measurement to monitor fatigue damage. By measuring deformation instead of temperature, the method achieves accelerated testing capability using standard mechanical testing equipment rather than expensive and sensitive thermographic systems, maintaining productivity while reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid and precise characterization of fatigue behavior with fewer specimens and lower costs, reducing testing time to a few hours while minimizing equipment complexity and external influences.

Implementation Method 1

successive test blocks, where cyclic loads are applied to a specimen... The cyclic loads of each test block have an amplitude higher than the amplitude of the cyclic loads of the preceding test blocks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFatigue: Fatigue

Implementation Method 2

performing deformation tests between said successive test blocks to monitor the fatigue damage of the specimen during the test

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4193138B1Fatigue limit testing method for specimens
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 FUNDACIO EURECAT
  • EP4193138B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4193138B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4193138B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Fatigue limit testing method for specimens comprising subjecting a specimen (10) to be tested to successive test blocks (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7), each test block (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) comprising applying to the specimen successive cyclic loads according to load parameters with an amplitude bigger than the load parameters of cyclic loads of the preceding test block; subjecting said specimen to successive deformation tests (a, b, c, d, e, f), each deformation test being performed between two successive test blocks and comprising the application of a isolated specific load to the specimen and performing deformation measurements from said element while being subjected to said specific load; and characterizing a fatigue behavior of the specimen considering at least a variation occurring on the successive deformation measurements and considering the load parameters of cyclic loads preceding each deformation measurement.