Specimen Testing Machine With Guide Plate Folding Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to accurately calculate maximum bending stress without restraining specimen ends during a two-point folding test, fail to form a micro radius of curvature at the center portion, and cannot control the folding direction effectively, especially when performing folding tests on flexible elements like foldable OLEDs.

Innovation Solution

A specimen testing machine with a gripper part to hold specimen ends, a specimen driving part for longitudinal movement, a guide plate unit to adjust folding direction, and a tilting part to control folding, allowing for a micro radius of curvature formation at the center portion and enabling both folding and tensile tests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the opposite ends of the specimen are restrained during folding test, then the folding direction can be controlled, but the maximum bending stress cannot be accurately calculated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolding direction controlVSAvoidmaximum bending stress calculation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the functions of specimen holding and folding direction control into distinct components: gripper parts for holding and guide plates for direction control. This segmentation allows the specimen ends to be restrained for directional control while maintaining the ability to calculate bending stress through the relationship between applied force and geometric parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guide plate acts as an intermediary element that controls the folding direction without directly restraining the specimen ends. It guides the motion path and ensures proper folding orientation while allowing the specimen to maintain its natural bending behavior for accurate stress calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the specimen is folded until opposite ends are in contact, then the folding test is maximized, but the radius of curvature at center portion becomes large and stress concentration is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolding test efficiencyVSAvoidradius of curvature at center portion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The guide plate creates a localized constraint at the center portion of the specimen, forcing a small radius of curvature specifically at that location. This local quality change ensures stress concentration occurs where needed for accurate service life evaluation, while the rest of the specimen can be folded efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If only one-direction folding test is performed, then the test procedure is simple, but the service life evaluation is inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest procedure complexityVSAvoidservice life evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables dynamic switching between different folding directions through the tilting part and guide plate mechanism. This allows the specimen to be tested in multiple directions (upward, downward, leftward, rightward) by adjusting the guide plate orientation, providing comprehensive service life evaluation while maintaining relatively simple operation through automated direction control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate calculation of maximum bending stress without restraining specimen ends, forms a micro radius of curvature, and allows objective service life evaluation by controlling the folding direction, facilitating both folding and tensile tests.

Implementation Method 1

bending stress, etc. can be calculated through a two-point folding test... applying the bending stress to the specimen... The maximum bending stress (σmax) generated on a neutral surface (neutral axis) of the specimen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBending stress: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

a guide plate that may be configured to be moved along with a folding direction of the specimen, and to be folded at a center portion thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFolding: Folding

Implementation Method 3

a specimen test unit including: a pair of gripper parts configured to respectively hold opposite ends of a specimen... a specimen driving part configured to move the specimen in a longitudinal direction of the specimen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTensile stress: Tension

Data Source

PatentUS12422344B2Specimen testing machine
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 HAN SANG NIM
  • US12422344B2 patent drawing
  • US12422344B2 patent drawing
  • US12422344B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a specimen testing machine which includes: a specimen test unit comprising: a pair of gripper parts configured to respectively hold opposite ends of a specimen, a gripper fixing part configured to fix at least any one of the pair of gripper parts, and a specimen driving part configured to move the specimen in a longitudinal direction of the specimen; and a guide plate unit including: a guide plate that is configured to be moved along with a folding direction of the specimen, and to be folded at a center portion thereof, and a second driving part comprising a second fixing part configured to fix opposite ends of the guide plate, and configured to move the specimen in the longitudinal direction of the specimen.