Spectacle Frame Hinge with Internal Elastic Cursor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spectacles frames with inclinable temples suffer from wear and breakage due to torsion stresses on mechanical components, and current solutions are expensive, complex, and aesthetically limiting, with protruding cursor elements that increase production costs and user discomfort.

Innovation Solution

A frame design featuring elastic cushioning and recall means with a cursor element completely inside the temple, using longitudinal elastic means that reduce torsion stress and allow automatic return to the open position, made with cost-effective materials and simplified hinging mechanisms, eliminating the need for high-torsion-resistant materials and complex designs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If elastic return means are disposed to allow temple inclination, then ease of operation is improved, but the mechanical components suffer from torsion stresses causing wear and breakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of putting on and taking off spectaclesVSAvoidresistance to deformation and breakage of hinge components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical hinge system with an elastic monoblock component that integrates the hinge function. This eliminates mechanical wear and torsion stress on separate components by using the elastic deformation of a single piece of material (such as memory metal or elastic polymer) to provide both the inclination movement and the return force, thereby solving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the hinge mechanism and the elastic return spring into a single monoblock component. By combining these previously separate elements into one integrated structure, the design eliminates the mechanical interface that causes wear and torsion stress, while maintaining the dual functionality of inclination movement and automatic return

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If traditional elastic return means are used, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple components like springs, sliders, and cams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic return of temples to open positionVSAvoidnumber of components in hinge system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate components (hinge mechanism, elastic spring, sliders, cams) into a single monoblock elastic component. This integration maintains the automatic return functionality while dramatically reducing the number of parts, simplifying the overall device structure, and eliminating the need for complex mechanical assemblies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If cursor element protrudes outside the temple to define limit positions, then ease of operation is improved, but aesthetics are compromised and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefinition of limit positions for temple opening and closingVSAvoidaesthetic conformation of the temple
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent nests the cursor element that defines limit positions completely inside the bulk of the temple structure. By placing the functional element within the temple rather than having it protrude outward, the design maintains smooth external surfaces for aesthetic purposes while still providing the necessary mechanical function of defining opening and closing limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Reliability

If high-torsion-resistant materials are used for hinges, then reliability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduration of hinge functionalityVSAvoidproduction cost of frame
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical hinge system that requires high-torsion-resistant materials with an elastic monoblock component. This substitution eliminates the need for expensive specialized materials because the elastic component naturally resists deformation through its material properties (such as memory metal or elastic polymer) without requiring high-strength alloys or complex heat treatments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters by using elastic materials (memory metal, elastic polymer) with specific elastic properties rather than high-strength rigid materials. This parameter change allows the component to achieve both reliability and manufacturability by utilizing the elastic deformation characteristics of the material instead of relying on high-torsion strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides prolonged resistance to deformation and breakage, reduces production costs, simplifies assembly, enhances aesthetics, and prevents user discomfort by minimizing protrusions and torsion stress, while maintaining the functionality of easy on/off operations.

Implementation Method 1

elastic cushioning and recall means associated with the hinging means, which allow an inclination of the temples towards the outside, beyond the normal positions of use, with automatic return to the open position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7775658B2Frame for spectacles
Publication Date: 2010.08.17 TARGET CORPORATION
  • US7775658B2 patent drawing
  • US7775658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Spectacles frame including a front component supporting a pair of lenses, two supporting temples each hinged by respective hinging elements to the front component, and cushioning and recall members associated with the hinging elements. Cushioning members include: elastic elements in an open seating, inside the respective temple bulk, configured so part of the elastic elements faces outside in the open seating, towards the front component; and a cursor element as an extension and completely inside the bulk of the respective temple, to slide longitudinally along it at the moment of opening-closing of the respective temple relative to the front component, and having a second surface, or external surface, contacting the front component, and a first surface, or internal surface, opposite the second surface, on which the part of the elastic elements facing outside in open seating acts, to keep the cursor element normally thrusting against the front component.