Spectacle Frame Input Device for Reliable Jaw Movement Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing eye-tracking devices for individuals with severe congenital limb defects often malfunction due to involuntary movements, requiring users to limit their blinks and leading to user fatigue.

Innovation Solution

An information input device integrated into a spectacle frame, featuring a distortion detection unit, a measurement electrode, and determination units to differentiate between voluntary face and jaw movements, allowing for natural input operations without malfunctions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If eye-tracking is used to detect user intent, then information input capability is provided, but involuntary movements cause malfunctions and increase user burden

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation input capabilityVSAvoidoperation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the detection of user intent into multiple independent channels: eye movement detection, facial muscle detection (via electrodes), and jaw movement detection (via acceleration sensor). Each channel operates independently to detect different aspects of user intent, and the system integrates these segments to make a comprehensive determination, thereby reducing false activations from involuntary movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces intermediate verification mechanisms between the detection of involuntary movement and the execution of click operations. The control unit acts as an intermediary that receives signals from multiple sensors (eye tracker, electrodes, acceleration sensor) and applies logical conditions to verify whether a detected movement represents true user intent before triggering an operation, thus preventing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If users limit blinks to avoid malfunctions, then operation reliability improves, but user burden and fatigue increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation reliabilityVSAvoiduser burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification by using multiple independent detection channels to cross-validate each other. The eye tracker, facial electrodes, and acceleration sensor independently monitor different physiological signals, and the control unit synthesizes these signals to determine true user intent, eliminating the need for users to consciously control or limit their natural behaviors like blinking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the detection parameters from relying solely on eye movement (which is prone to involuntary activation) to a multi-parameter approach including facial muscle electrical signals and jaw acceleration patterns. By monitoring multiple parameters simultaneously and requiring consistent signals across channels, the system achieves reliable operation without constraining user behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple detection methods are combined, then reliability against involuntary movements improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spectacle frame serves multiple functions: it supports the eye tracker for gaze detection, contains electrodes for facial muscle detection, and houses an acceleration sensor for jaw movement detection. By integrating these diverse detection capabilities into a single universal device (the spectacles), the invention reduces overall system complexity compared to using separate devices for each detection method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges multiple detection functions (eye tracking, facial electromyography, jaw acceleration sensing) into a single integrated system within the spectacle frame. The control unit consolidates signals from all sensors and applies unified processing logic, reducing the complexity that would arise from coordinating multiple separate devices and simplifying the user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables users to input information naturally with reduced user burden, preventing malfunctions caused by involuntary movements and minimizing fatigue.

Implementation Method 1

a measurement electrode provided in a temple tip of the spectacle frame and configured to measure an electric signal caused by a movement of a jaw of the wearer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric signal measurement:

Implementation Method 2

an acceleration sensor provided in the spectacle frame and configured to measure vibration occurred on the spectacle frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration measurement: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS12340009B2Information input device
Publication Date: 2025.06.24 NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP
  • US12340009B2 patent drawing
  • US12340009B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A first determination unit determines that a movement of a face of a wearer has occurred, when a distortion detection unit detects distortion of the spectacle frame. The second determination unit determines whether a movement of a jaw of the wearer has occurred, based on an electric signal measured by a first temple tip electrode and a second temple tip electrode with a common electrode as a ground potential. An output unit outputs a command due to operation of the spectacle frame by the wearer when the first determination unit determines that the movement of the face of the wearer has occurred and at the same time the second determination unit determines that the movement of the jaw of the wearer has occurred.