Spectacle Lens Angle Measurement Using Mirrored Laser Scan Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for measuring the lens angle of glasses, particularly those with diffusely reflective and transparent surfaces, face challenges in distinguishing reflection signals from the front and back of the lens, leading to unreliable measurements and requiring manual intervention for approximately one-third of lenses.

Innovation Solution

A method involving laser scanning to generate surface position data points, mirroring and optimizing these points relative to a median plane, and using regression polynomials to determine the lens angle, while filtering out noise and interference signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If laser scanning is used to measure lens angle, then measurement automation is improved, but measurement reliability deteriorates due to signal scattering and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement automationVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the lens surface measurement into multiple zones (front surface, back surface, edge regions) and processes reflection signals from each zone separately. By dividing the complex measurement task into manageable segments, the system can selectively use reliable signals from different lens regions while filtering out unreliable scattered signals, thereby improving overall measurement reliability while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary evaluation process that acts as a mediator between the laser scanning system and the final measurement result. This intermediary layer analyzes and filters reflection signals, distinguishing reliable signals from scattered ones before they are used for measurement. The intermediary processing step resolves the contradiction by enabling automated measurement while filtering out unreliable signals that would otherwise degrade measurement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If reflection signals are used for lens angle measurement, then non-contact measurement is achieved, but signal differentiation becomes difficult due to front and back surface reflections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-contact measurementVSAvoidsignal differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality analysis by examining different regions of the lens surface separately - the front surface, back surface, and edge regions each have distinct reflection characteristics. By analyzing the local quality of reflection signals from different zones, the system can differentiate between signals from various surfaces and assign appropriate weights to each, resolving the signal differentiation difficulty while maintaining non-contact measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces another dimension of analysis by considering not only the position of reflection signals but also their spatial distribution patterns and intensity characteristics across the lens surface. This multi-dimensional approach enables the system to distinguish between front surface, back surface, and edge reflections based on their distinctive signal patterns, thereby resolving the differentiation problem while preserving the ease of non-contact measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If manual measurement is used for unreliable lenses, then measurement reliability is improved for difficult cases, but productivity deteriorates due to manual intervention requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the automated measurement system continuously evaluates the reliability of its own measurements by analyzing signal quality and measurement consistency. When the system detects unreliable signals or measurement artifacts, it automatically adjusts its processing parameters or requests re-measurement, providing feedback that maintains high measurement reliability while minimizing the need for manual intervention and thus preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by dynamically adjusting measurement and processing parameters based on the characteristics of each lens and the quality of detected signals. When certain lenses produce scattered or unreliable signals, the system changes processing parameters such as signal filtering thresholds, weightings, or measurement zones to optimize reliability for that specific lens type, thereby maintaining high productivity across all lenses without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If reflection signals are filtered to remove noise, then measurement precision is improved, but processing complexity increases due to signal processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial filtering by selectively processing and filtering reflection signals based on their source and reliability rather than filtering all signals uniformly. The system processes only the necessary portions of the signal - filtering front surface reflections when back surface reflections are needed, and vice versa - while leaving other signals unprocessed. This partial action approach achieves high measurement precision while minimizing processing complexity by avoiding unnecessary filtering operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary organization of reflection signals by pre-categorizing them into distinct groups (front surface, back surface, edge regions) before the filtering process. This preliminary classification simplifies the subsequent filtering operations, as the system only needs to apply appropriate filtering criteria to each pre-defined group rather than processing all signals uniformly. The preliminary action reduces processing complexity while maintaining high measurement precision through targeted filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases the reliability of lens angle measurement, achieving accurate results for over 97% of glasses, compared to the previous method's 33% success rate.

Implementation Method 1

The RCA comprises a laser scanner that uses laser beams reflected from the glasses to determine a height profile of the lens surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4577873B1Method and device for measuring the frame lens angle of spectacles, and computer program product
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 RODENSTOCK GMBH
  • EP4577873B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP4577873B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP4577873B1 patent drawingFigure 6

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for measuring the frame lens angle of spectacles, having the steps of arranging (100) the spectacles, which have a first spectacle lens and a second spectacle lens, on a spectacles receiving area. The surfaces of the two spectacle lenses of the spectacles are scanned (110) by means of a scanner in order to generate first surface position data points of the first spectacle lens and second surface position data points of the second spectacle lens. The first surface position data points of the first spectacle lens are mirrored (120) onto the second surface position data points of the second spectacle lens with respect to a central plane (M) between the two spectacle lenses such that the first and second surface position data points of the two spectacle lenses are superimposed. A compensation function (A) is ascertained (121) as a surface function using the superimposed surface position data points of the two spectacle lenses, and the frame lens angle is ascertained (160) by means of the surface function using the superimposed surface position data points of the two spectacle lenses.