Spectacle Lens Evaluation Using Prism Change Rates for Distortion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods and devices for evaluating progressive multifocal lenses fail to provide a numerical assessment of distortion and shaking, preventing quantitative comparison and evaluation of these optical performance aspects.

Innovation Solution

A performance evaluation method and computer-readable storage medium that calculate distortion and shaking evaluation values using formulas based on prism refractive index components, allowing for quantitative assessment through a computer system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing methods and devices are used to evaluate progressive multifocal lenses, then visual field images can be obtained, but quantitative expression and comparison of distortion and shaking performance cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantitative measurement capabilityVSAvoidmeasurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the evaluation from qualitative visual field imaging to quantitative measurement by calculating specific parameters (distortion evaluation value and shaking evaluation value) based on prism refractive index components. This parameter-based approach enables numerical comparison and precise assessment of lens performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/optical visualization system with a computational mathematical model. By using formulas that calculate evaluation values from prism refractive index data, the system substitutes physical measurement equipment with computer-based calculations, achieving quantitative results without complex measurement apparatus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If visual field experience devices are used, then distortion aberration can be experienced visually, but numerical expression of distortion and shaking performance is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation quantificationVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential evaluation information (distortion and shaking characteristics) from the complex visual field experience device by calculating specific evaluation values from prism refractive index components. This extraction process isolates the key performance metrics without requiring the entire visual field experience system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a computational model that copies the essential evaluation function from the physical visual field experience device. By formulating mathematical expressions that replicate the distortion and shaking evaluation capabilities, the system achieves numerical expression without needing the complex physical device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If prism refractive index components are used for calculation, then quantitative distortion and shaking evaluation values can be obtained, but the evaluation method requires new computational formulas and approaches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidmethod implementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process into distinct computational steps: calculating the first component (horizontal prism refractive index change rate), calculating the second component (vertical prism refractive index change rate), and combining these to obtain distortion and shaking evaluation values. This segmentation makes the complex evaluation method systematically implementable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calculations of the prism refractive index components before computing the final evaluation values. By pre-calculating the first and second components from the lens design data, the system prepares the necessary inputs that simplify the subsequent evaluation steps and improve computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12607879B2Performance evaluation method for spectacle lens and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 TOKAI OPTICAL CO LTD
  • US12607879B2 patent drawing
  • US12607879B2 patent drawing
  • US12607879B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A performance evaluation method for a spectacle lens comprising calculating a change rate of a first component and a change rate of a second component with a computer to calculate at least one of a distortion evaluation value and a shaking evaluation value, the first component being a component in a first direction of a prism refractive index, the second component being a component in a second direction of the prism refractive index, the distortion evaluation value being a value for evaluating a distortion regarding a spectacle lens, the shaking evaluation value being a value for evaluating a shaking regarding the spectacle lens.