Spectating System Reward Mechanism for Real-Time Game Interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current online gaming spectating systems lack the ability to effectively integrate game metadata and spectator interactions to enhance the viewing experience and influence game dynamics in real-time, limiting the engagement and interactivity for spectators.

Innovation Solution

A game spectating system that receives game metadata and processes spectator inputs to generate dynamic broadcast content and feedback, allowing spectators to affect game events and player experiences through interactive interfaces, enabling real-time influence on game states and outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If spectators only watch passive broadcasts without interaction capabilities, then system complexity remains low, but spectator engagement and participation are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectator engagementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback loops where spectator interactions (votes, messages, predictions) are processed and fed back into the game system to influence game events. This creates a closed-loop system where spectator input directly affects game outcomes, transforming passive viewing into active participation while managing complexity through structured feedback mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The spectating system is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: broadcasting game content, collecting spectator interactions, processing game metadata, generating rewards, and influencing game events. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate systems into a unified platform, achieving high spectator engagement without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system processes complex game metadata and spectator inputs in real-time, then interactive experience is enhanced, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteractive experienceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of game metadata as events occur during gameplay, preparing data structures and predictions in advance before spectator interactions are submitted. This pre-processing approach ensures that when spectators vote or make predictions, the system can quickly match their inputs against pre-computed game states, reducing real-time processing delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components such as prediction models and metadata processing layers that act as mediators between raw game data and spectator interactions. These intermediaries pre-analyze game states and prepare response options, allowing the system to handle complex interactions without requiring extensive real-time computation for each spectator input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If the system integrates multiple data sources including game metadata and spectator inputs, then broadcast content quality improves, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebroadcast content qualityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing system into distinct modules: game metadata processing, spectator input processing, prediction generation, reward determination, and broadcast content generation. Each module handles specific data types and transformations independently, then passes results to the next module. This segmentation maintains high broadcast content quality through specialized processing while reducing overall complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the data processing system are optimized for their specific functions: game metadata is processed with high precision for accurate game state representation, spectator inputs are processed for engagement metrics, and predictions are generated with appropriate confidence levels. This local optimization ensures high overall content quality without requiring uniform high complexity across all processing components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10390064B2Participant rewards in a spectating system
Publication Date: 2019.08.20 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10390064B2 patent drawing
  • US10390064B2 patent drawing
  • US10390064B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spectating system that leverages game metadata and/or broadcast metadata to provide rewards to or otherwise acknowledge participants in broadcasts. The system may analyze the metadata to detect events or other information about broadcasts, and may recognize and/or reward participants based at least in part on the analysis. Spectators may be rewarded for participating in broadcasts, or in particular events in broadcasts. Broadcasters may be rewarded for in-game achievements or for achieving levels of audience participation or support. Participants may select or vote on other participants to receive rewards. Rewards may, for example, include acknowledgement of participants via the user interface, virtual items such as in-game virtual gear, physical items such as game-related merchandise, and granting of benefits or privileges by the spectating system and/or game system such as special content for a broadcaster's channel.