Spectral Baseline Estimation Using Peak-Guided Parameter Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to accurately estimate the baseline in spectral data, leading to difficulties in quantitatively evaluating peak intensity and identifying minute differences in spectra due to subjective parameter optimization.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the nonlinear least squares method with iterative adjustment of parameters λ and ratio, and optimization of weights w i based on the difference between the original signal and the baseline estimate, allowing for high-accuracy baseline estimation by selecting the optimal baseline based on peak number and area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a nonlinear least squares method is used to estimate the baseline, then the baseline estimation can be performed automatically, but the accuracy of baseline estimation deteriorates due to difficulty in optimizing parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebaseline estimationVSAvoidbaseline estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an iterative optimization process where the baseline estimation is repeatedly performed with adjusted parameters, and the results are evaluated using peak detection metrics. The parameters are updated based on feedback from peak number and peak area comparisons, enabling automatic optimization of baseline estimation accuracy without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies multiple parameters (λ, ratio, and weight decay) in a structured manner to explore the parameter space. By changing parameters in iterations and evaluating the impact on peak characteristics, the method automatically identifies optimal parameter combinations that maximize baseline estimation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If parameters are optimized manually to improve baseline estimation accuracy, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and operation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebaseline estimation accuracyVSAvoidparameter optimization process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service optimization system where the baseline estimation process automatically adjusts its own parameters based on predefined criteria. The system evaluates multiple parameter combinations and selects the optimal ones based on peak detection performance, eliminating the need for manual parameter tuning while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The method incorporates feedback mechanisms where the results of baseline estimation are automatically evaluated using peak number and peak area metrics. This feedback loop enables the system to self-correct and optimize parameters without human intervention, reducing operational complexity while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the baseline is overcorrected to remove all baseline components, then measurement precision improves, but harmful factors increase due to distortion of peak shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak intensity evaluationVSAvoidpeak shape distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from peak detection to evaluate baseline estimation quality. By monitoring peak number and peak area in the corrected spectrum, the system can detect when baseline correction is excessive and automatically adjust parameters to prevent overcorrection, thereby preserving accurate peak shape information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The method employs a balanced approach to baseline correction by controlling the degree of correction through parameter adjustment. Rather than attempting complete baseline removal, the system applies partial correction that is sufficient to eliminate baseline interference while preserving peak characteristics, avoiding the harmful effects of excessive correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4675464A1Calculation program, calculation method, and information processing device
Publication Date: 2026.01.07 FUJITSU LTD
  • EP4675464A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4675464A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4675464A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

[PROBLEM] Provide a calculation program, a calculation method, and an information processing device capable of estimating a baseline with high accuracy. [SOLUTION TO PROBLEM] A calculation program causes a computer to execute a process including an acquisition process of changing a parameter for identifying a baseline to multiple values to obtain multiple estimated baselines estimated for each of the multiple values, an identification process of identifying peaks in multiple graphs that represent differences between a base data of spectral data and each of the multiple estimated baselines, and a selection process of selecting a first graph from the multiple graphs according to a number of peaks and a peak area of each of the multiple graphs, when identifying the baseline using a nonlinear least squares method for the base data.