Spectral Baseline Estimation Using Peak-Guided Parameter Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for baseline correction in spectral data, such as nonlinear least squares, face challenges in accurately estimating the baseline due to subjective parameter optimization, leading to difficulties in quantitatively evaluating peak intensity and identifying minute differences.

Innovation Solution

A method involving changing parameters to multiple values, iteratively estimating multiple baselines, and selecting the most accurate one based on peak number and area using the nonlinear least squares method.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If parameter optimization is performed subjectively in nonlinear least squares method, then baseline estimation can be obtained, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to lack of objective criteria

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebaseline estimation accuracyVSAvoidparameter optimization objectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention implements feedback by using detected peaks as validation criteria for baseline estimation. The system estimates a baseline, detects peaks in the corrected spectrum, and uses peak characteristics (number, position, area) to evaluate whether the baseline estimation is appropriate. This feedback loop replaces subjective parameter optimization with objective peak-based validation, improving both measurement precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The invention substitutes the mechanical/subjective parameter optimization process with an automated peak detection and evaluation system. Instead of relying on subjective judgment to optimize baseline estimation parameters, the system automatically detects peaks and uses peak characteristics to objectively evaluate baseline quality, replacing human subjectivity with automated analytical criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If baseline is not accurately estimated, then processing speed can be maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to quantitatively evaluate peak intensity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak intensity evaluationVSAvoidbaseline estimation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary peak detection on the original spectrum before baseline estimation. By detecting peaks in advance and using their characteristics as target criteria, the system guides the baseline estimation process to achieve accurate peak intensity evaluation. This preliminary action enables subsequent quantitative evaluation without requiring iterative re-estimation, maintaining processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses detected peak characteristics as feedback criteria to evaluate baseline estimation quality. After estimating a baseline and correcting the spectrum, the system detects peaks and evaluates whether their characteristics match expected patterns. This feedback mechanism ensures accurate peak intensity evaluation while maintaining efficiency by avoiding unnecessary iterative estimations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional baseline correction is applied, then processing can be completed quickly, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to peak distortion and inability to reveal buried peaks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak shape preservationVSAvoidbaseline correction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses peak detection as a feedback mechanism to evaluate whether baseline correction preserves peak shapes. After baseline estimation and correction, the system detects peaks and evaluates their characteristics. If peaks are distorted or buried peaks are not revealed, the system can adjust the baseline estimation parameters and re-estimate, ensuring high manufacturing precision without sacrificing too much productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements a dynamic baseline estimation approach where the system can adaptively adjust estimation parameters based on peak detection results. Rather than using a fixed conventional correction method, the system dynamically modifies its estimation process based on feedback from peak characteristics, enabling it to preserve peak shapes and reveal buried peaks while maintaining reasonable processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250389701A1Non-transitory computer-readable recording medium, calculation method and information processing device
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 FUJITSU LTD
  • US20250389701A1 patent drawing
  • US20250389701A1 patent drawing
  • US20250389701A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A calculation program causes a computer to execute a process including an acquisition process of changing a parameter for identifying a baseline to multiple values to obtain multiple estimated baselines estimated for each of the multiple values, an identification process of identifying peaks in multiple graphs that represent differences between a base data of spectral data and each of the multiple estimated baselines, and a selection process of selecting a first graph from the multiple graphs according to a number of peaks and a peak area of each of the multiple graphs, when identifying the baseline using a nonlinear least squares method for the base data.