Spectral Threat Warning Classification Using Multi-Band Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current passive threat warning systems for aircraft and other assets are unable to accurately distinguish between actual threats and benign energy emitters, leading to unnecessary resource allocation and potential waste or harm, as they rely on a two-color sensor approach that cannot differentiate between sun glints and terrestrial 'hot' events.

Innovation Solution

A spectral-based classification method that defines three classes of electromagnetic-energy emitting sources (non-terrestrial, terrestrial non-threatening, and terrestrial threatening) using carefully selected wavelength sub-ranges and reference-profile data to measure and compare relative energy intensities, accounting for atmospheric absorption characteristics to accurately discern threat levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a two-color sensor approach is used to detect electromagnetic energy in narrow bands, then the system can eliminate certain types of clutter sources like sun glints, but it cannot accurately distinguish between benign terrestrial events and actual threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat discernment accuracyVSAvoidspectral sensor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the electromagnetic spectrum into multiple discrete wavelength bands (at least three distinct bands) rather than using only two bands. This segmentation allows the system to analyze spectral characteristics across different regions, enabling differentiation between various emission sources based on their unique spectral signatures. Each wavelength band provides additional discriminatory information that helps distinguish threats from benign events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional detection approach (two wavelength bands) to a higher-dimensional spectral analysis by incorporating at least three wavelength bands. This dimensional expansion in spectral space creates additional degrees of freedom for discrimination, allowing the system to better separate threat signatures from clutter and benign events through multi-dimensional spectral pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If current two-color sensor systems are used for threat detection, then the system structure remains simple, but numerous benign events must be regarded as potential threats leading to unnecessary resource allocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system structureVSAvoidunnecessary ordnance expenditure
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the simple two-color sensor mechanical approach with a more sophisticated spectral analysis system that uses multiple wavelength bands and computational algorithms. This substitution transforms the detection methodology from basic intensity comparison to advanced spectral fingerprinting, enabling more accurate identification of threats and reducing false alarms that lead to unnecessary ordnance expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameters by monitoring at least three distinct wavelength bands instead of only two. This parameter change provides additional spectral information that improves the ability to distinguish between different emission sources. By analyzing the relative intensities and patterns across multiple wavelength bands, the system can more accurately identify threats and avoid wasting resources on benign events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If a two-color sensor regime is implemented, then the system can compare energy in one narrow band to another, but it cannot discern whether events not eliminated as clutter present actual threats or are benign emitters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent classification accuracyVSAvoidspectral characteristic analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal spectral analysis framework that can identify and classify multiple types of emission sources (sun glints, terrestrial thermal events, missile plumes, laser threats) using a single multi-band sensor system. This universal approach allows the same system to handle diverse detection scenarios by analyzing spectral patterns across at least three wavelength bands, providing versatile threat identification capability without requiring separate specialized sensors for each threat type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces spectral ratio analysis as an intermediary computational method that compares energy intensities across multiple wavelength bands. This intermediary approach transforms raw spectral data into meaningful classification metrics by calculating ratios and patterns that characteristic of different emission sources. The spectral analysis algorithm acts as a mediator between the physical sensor measurements and the final threat classification decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances the accuracy of threat discernment by eliminating non-threatening events, reducing unnecessary resource allocation and minimizing the risk of misidentifying benign sources as threats, thereby preventing wasteful ordnance expenditure and ensuring more effective threat management.

Implementation Method 1

sensing emitted energy in the ultraviolet, visible, and/or infrared bands emitted from the suspected threat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation detection: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

accounting for atmospheric absorption characteristics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtmospheric absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS8017912B1System and method for spectral-based passive threat warning
Publication Date: 2011.09.13 SOLID STATE SCIENTIFIC CORP
  • US8017912B1 patent drawing
  • US8017912B1 patent drawing
  • US8017912B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of classifying an electromagnetic-energy emitting source event as one of a first, second, and third class event includes registering an irradiance spectrum from the source event. The intensity of the energy emitted from the source event is measured within each of first, second and third energy sub-ranges and first, second and third relative-energy values are associated with, respectively, the first, second and third energy sub-ranges. A first class-eliminating determination is rendered by comparing to one another a first selected set of two of the relative-energy values, thereby yielding two remaining-candidate event classes. When necessary, a second class-eliminating determination renders the proper classification for the source event by comparing to one another a second selected set of relative-energy values including the relative-energy value not selected for inclusion in the first selected set of two relative-energy values and one of the previously selected relative-energy values. The energy-value comparisons are carried out with reference to modeled source-event irradiance data from which expected ratio behaviors among the selected energy sub-ranges are ascertainable relative particular event types at various ranges and under disparate atmospheric conditions.