Spectrometer Bias Determination via Grating Over-Scanning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Miniaturized spectrometer systems face challenges in accurately determining bias due to limited space for mechanical shutters and reduced accuracy in existing methods, necessitating a more innovative approach for bias determination.

Innovation Solution

The method involves over-scanning a grating in a near-zero-response wavelength range to determine bias, using a filter-absorbing wavelength region where the detector's response is minimal, and employing a combination of masked and unmasked detector elements to calculate bias adjustment values, eliminating the need for mechanical shutters and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a mechanical shutter is used to determine bias in a scanning spectrometer, then bias determination accuracy is improved, but device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebias determination accuracyVSAvoidmechanical shutter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical shutter system with an optical filtering approach. Instead of using a physical shutter that moves to block light, the invention uses a fixed optical filter (such as a long-pass or short-pass filter) positioned in the optical path to selectively block specific wavelength ranges. This substitution eliminates moving mechanical parts while achieving the same bias determination function through wavelength-selective absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the shutter function from the mechanical system and implements it through a stationary optical filter. The filter is designed to absorb light in specific wavelength regions (near-zero-response wavelength range), effectively removing the need for mechanical movement. This extraction separates the bias determination function from the mechanical positioning system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If a mechanical shutter is installed in miniaturized spectrometer systems, then bias determination capability is improved, but space constraints are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebias determination capabilityVSAvoidspace for mechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical shutter with a stationary optical filter that requires no moving parts. The filter is mounted fixed in the optical path, eliminating the need for space-consuming mechanical assemblies. This substitution is particularly important for miniaturized spectrometers where every cubic inch counts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes the mechanical shutter component entirely and replaces it with a stationary optical filtering element. This extraction of the mechanical system allows the spectrometer to achieve bias determination capability without the space requirements of mechanical movement, enabling miniaturization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If over-scanning is performed in a near-zero-response wavelength range, then bias determination accuracy is improved, but measurement time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebias determination accuracyVSAvoidtime for over-scanning
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the over-scan in a near-zero-response wavelength range as a preliminary action during the normal measurement process. By positioning the filter to block wavelengths where the detector has minimal response, the system can determine bias without requiring separate, time-consuming measurement sequences. The over-scan occurs automatically as part of the standard scanning operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the wavelength parameter by directing the detector to measure in a near-zero-response wavelength range (using the optical filter to select these wavelengths). This parameter change allows bias determination to occur during normal operation without adding significant time, as the detector is already scanning through the spectrum and simply focuses on a specific wavelength region where the filter absorbs light.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise bias determination in compact spectrometer systems, enhancing accuracy and reducing mechanical complexity, while maintaining or improving measurement quality.

Implementation Method 1

a wavelength range in a filter-absorbing wavelength region of a filter in the optical path of a detector used to perform the over-scan

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption (EM radiation): Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

a diffraction grating is rotated through a specified angle to bring the desired wavelengths to the detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Data Source

PatentUS9207118B2Apparatus, system and method for scanning monochromator and diode array spectrometer instrumentation
Publication Date: 2015.12.08 MALVERN PANALYTICAL INC
  • US9207118B2 patent drawing
  • US9207118B2 patent drawing
  • US9207118B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for determining bias in a spectrometer is described. One embodiment includes a method for determining bias in a spectrometer system, the method comprising over-scanning a grating in a near-zero-response wavelength range; and determining a bias based on the over-scanning. This methodology allows for over-scanning a grating in a near-zero-response wavelength range as a substitute for using shutters or other mechanisms to block light from entering a detector in the system.