Spectroscopic Quantification Boundary Screening for False Positive Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spectroscopic quantification methods suffer from false positive identifications due to incorrect sample types or improper measurement conditions, leading to inaccurate determinations of component concentrations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a single class support vector machine (SC-SVM) technique to analyze spectroscopic measurements, determining confidence metrics and decision boundaries to verify if an unknown sample corresponds to the intended material type, thereby reducing false positive identifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional spectroscopic quantification methods are used, then measurement speed is improved, but false positive identification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement speedVSAvoididentification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing sample verification against a decision boundary before conducting the actual quantification measurement. The SC-SVM model pre-establishes a decision boundary that separates valid samples from invalid ones, allowing the system to quickly filter out incorrect samples before they can cause false positive identifications. This preliminary classification step prevents wasted measurement time on invalid samples while maintaining high identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If spectroscopic measurements are performed on all samples, then productivity is improved, but measurement accuracy deteriorates due to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidconcentration determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the taking out principle by extracting and removing invalid samples from the measurement process through the SC-SVM decision boundary evaluation. The system identifies and excludes samples that fall outside the decision boundary (indicating incorrect sample types or improper measurement conditions) before they can contaminate the quantification results. This extraction of invalid samples maintains high measurement precision while preserving productivity by avoiding rework of erroneous measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If a single class support vector machine is implemented, then identification reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample verification accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by utilizing the decision boundary parameter established by the SC-SVM model to transform a complex classification problem into a simple distance calculation. Instead of implementing a complex multi-class classification system, the patent changes the approach to using a single decision boundary parameter that separates valid from invalid samples. This parameter transformation maintains high identification reliability while significantly reducing computational complexity and model complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12481726B2Reduced false positive identification for spectroscopic quantification
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC(US)
  • US12481726B2 patent drawing
  • US12481726B2 patent drawing
  • US12481726B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device may receive information identifying results of a spectroscopic measurement performed on an unknown sample. The device may determine a decision boundary for a quantification model based on a configurable parameter, such that a first plurality of training set samples of the quantification model is within the decision boundary and a second plurality of training set samples of the quantification model is not within the decision boundary. The device may determine a distance metric for the spectroscopic measurement performed on the unknown sample relative to the decision boundary. The device may determine a plurality of distance metrics for the second plurality of training set samples of the quantification model relative to the decision boundary. The device may provide information indicating whether the spectroscopic measurement performed on the unknown sample corresponds to the quantification model.