Spectrum Sharing Coexistence via Priority Channel Access Intervals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing a communication scheme that allows for coexistence between synchronous and asynchronous channel access technologies is challenging due to differences in protocols, channel access procedures, and interference issues, making it difficult to ensure fair access and reduce interference between devices using different technologies.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves selecting channel access intervals with priority conditions and transmitting signals that include channel occupancy information and identification of subsequent access intervals, allowing devices to coordinate communications and avoid interference, particularly by using higher clear channel assessment deferral values and listen-before-talk procedures during low-priority intervals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If spectrum sharing systems use synchronous channel access with priority conditions, then access fairness and interference reduction are improved, but system complexity increases due to coordination requirements between different access technologies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess fairnessVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The channel access timeline is segmented into multiple channel access intervals, each with specific priority conditions. This segmentation allows different technologies to access the channel in discrete time slots, reducing interference while maintaining fairness without requiring continuous complex coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Priority conditions and channel occupancy information are established in advance before channel access intervals begin. This preliminary configuration enables devices to understand their access rights and coordination requirements beforehand, reducing real-time coordination complexity while ensuring fair access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If devices transmit channel occupancy information and subsequent interval identifiers during contention intervals, then interference reduction is improved, but transmission time and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidtransmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple types of information (channel occupancy information for current interval and identifiers for subsequent intervals) are merged into a single signal transmission during the contention interval. This consolidation reduces the total transmission time compared to sending separate signals for each information type while maintaining effective interference reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The channel occupancy information and subsequent interval identifiers are transmitted continuously during the contention interval without interruption. This continuous transmission ensures that all necessary coordination information is conveyed efficiently in one operation, minimizing time loss while maximizing interference reduction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If asynchronous channel access devices use listen-before-talk procedures with higher clear channel assessment deferral values, then coexistence fairness is improved, but channel access efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoexistence fairnessVSAvoidchannel access efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The clear channel assessment deferral values are dynamically adjusted based on the current channel access interval and priority conditions. During intervals where asynchronous devices have lower priority, higher deferral values are applied to ensure fairness. During intervals where efficiency is critical, deferral values are reduced to improve access efficiency, creating a dynamic balance between fairness and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11026097B2Coexistence between spectrum sharing systems and asynchronous channel access systems
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11026097B2 patent drawing
  • US11026097B2 patent drawing
  • US11026097B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a device may select a plurality of channel access intervals during which the device is associated with a priority condition relative to another device for communications by the device, wherein each of the plurality of channel access intervals includes a respective contention interval and a respective transmission opportunity; and may transmit, during a contention interval of a first channel access interval of the plurality of channel access intervals, a signal that includes: channel occupancy information for the device for a first transmission opportunity of the first channel access interval, and information that identifies at least a portion of one or more subsequent channel access intervals, of the plurality of channel access intervals, associated with the device. Numerous other aspects are provided.