Speculative Asynchronous Evolution Computing for Heterogeneous Clusters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In evolutionary computing, the process is often stalled by slow-running individuals or intermittent hardware failures, leading to inefficiencies and reduced utilization of computing resources, especially when evaluating a population of candidate solutions across heterogeneous machines.

Innovation Solution

Implementing speculative evolutionary computing techniques, where sub-populations can advance to the next generation independently if they do not satisfy the termination criterion, using an evolution manager to divide populations and compute fitness values in parallel, and allowing for speculative migrants or ranking to reduce the impact of slower nodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If synchronous evaluation of all sub-populations is enforced, then reliability of the evolutionary process is maintained, but productivity decreases due to stalls caused by slow-running nodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepeatability of evolutionary processVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The population is divided into multiple independent sub-populations that can evolve asynchronously. Each sub-population is evaluated independently without waiting for other sub-populations to complete, allowing parallel processing and preventing stalls caused by slow-running nodes while maintaining overall evolutionary reliability through periodic synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system speculatively advances sub-populations to the next generation before fitness evaluation is complete for all sub-populations. This preliminary action allows faster sub-populations to continue evolving without waiting for slower ones, improving resource utilization while validation mechanisms ensure evolutionary reliability is maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If all nodes must finish before advancing to next generation, then measurement precision of fitness values is ensured, but loss of time increases due to waiting for slowest node

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitness value accuracyVSAvoidwaiting time for slowest node
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial evaluation by allowing sub-populations to advance to the next generation based on available fitness data without waiting for complete evaluation of all sub-populations. This partial action reduces waiting time while validation mechanisms ensure that sufficient fitness information is obtained to maintain evolutionary accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Faster sub-populations are allowed to skip the waiting period and advance to the next generation before slower sub-populations complete their fitness evaluation. This rushing through of the evaluation bottleneck reduces overall loss of time while the system ensures that fitness values are eventually computed for all candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Productivity

If heterogeneous machines are used for parallel evaluation, then productivity increases through better resource utilization, but device complexity increases due to managing diverse hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparallel processing capabilityVSAvoidhardware management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evolutionary computing system is designed to operate across heterogeneous machines with different processing capabilities. The framework provides universal interfaces and abstractions that allow diverse hardware resources to be managed uniformly, enabling parallel evaluation of sub-populations across different machine types without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that manages communication and coordination between heterogeneous machines. This intermediary handles the complexity of diverse hardware by providing standardized interfaces for sub-population distribution, fitness evaluation collection, and synchronous barrier management, thereby enabling productive parallel processing without exposing hardware complexity to the evolutionary algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10346743B2Speculative asynchronous sub-population evolutionary computing
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10346743B2 patent drawing
  • US10346743B2 patent drawing
  • US10346743B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tool computes fitness values for a first generation of a first sub-population of a plurality of sub-populations. A population of candidate solutions for an optimization problem was previously divided into the plurality of sub-populations. The population of candidate solutions was created for an iterative computing process in accordance with an evolutionary algorithm to identify a most fit candidate solution for the optimization problem. The tool determines a speculative ranking of the first generation of the first sub-population prior to the fitness values being computed for all candidate solutions in the first generation of the first sub-population. The tool generates a next generation of the first sub-population based, at least in part, on the speculative ranking prior to completion of computation of the fitness values for the first generation of the first sub-population.