Speculative Execution Controller for Cyberattack Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity measures fail to effectively prevent cyberattacks that exploit speculative execution vulnerabilities without significantly impacting computing device performance, as preventing speculative execution reduces operating speed.

Innovation Solution

A malware detection system that reassigns control of speculative execution and reserved instructions from guest processes to host processes, allowing for continued operating speed while preventing malware from compromising the host environment, by using a controller in the host user space to emulate and handle these instructions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If speculative execution is prevented to stop cyberattacks, then security against cyberattacks is improved, but operating speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidoperating speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a controller as an intermediary component that sits between the guest process and the processor's speculative execution units. This controller monitors and manages speculative execution operations, allowing legitimate speculative execution to proceed while blocking or redirecting malicious speculative execution attempts. The controller acts as a mediator that preserves both security (by preventing attacks) and performance (by allowing benign speculative execution), thus resolving the technical contradiction between security and operating speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If control of speculative execution is reassigned from guest processes to host processes, then protection against cyberattacks is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against cyberattacksVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves as an intermediary management layer that handles speculative execution control without requiring fundamental changes to the processor architecture or virtualization infrastructure. By introducing this dedicated control component, the system can enforce security policies for speculative execution while maintaining compatibility with existing guest and host environments, thus managing the increase in system complexity in a controlled and organized manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the speculative execution control functionality by separating it into a dedicated controller component distinct from both the guest process and the core processor. This segmentation allows the host process to gain control over speculative execution operations through the controller interface, enabling security management while keeping the overall system architecture modular and manageable, thus addressing the complexity concern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If user space and kernel space separation is maintained to protect host environment, then security is improved, but malware can still exploit speculative execution to contravene isolation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehost environment securityVSAvoidspeculative execution exploits
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action by having the controller proactively monitor and control speculative execution operations before they can exploit vulnerabilities to contravene user/kernel space separation. The controller预先 (in advance) identifies and blocks malicious speculative execution attempts that would otherwise allow malware to access protected kernel space or host environment data, thus preventing the harmful effect before it can occur despite the existing isolation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11182473B1System and method for mitigating cyberattacks against processor operability by a guest process
Publication Date: 2021.11.23 MAGENTA SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC
  • US11182473B1 patent drawing
  • US11182473B1 patent drawing
  • US11182473B1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment of the disclosure, a method for reassigning execution of certain instructions directed to a speculative execution task or a reserved instruction, attempted by a guess process, to be handled by a host process is described herein. The method involves detecting whether a software component, operating within a virtual machine deployed within a guest environment of the network device, is attempting to execute an instruction associated with a speculative execution task. If so, the speculative execution task is prevented from being performed by the software component without the virtual machine detecting that speculative execution by the software component has been reassigned.