Speculative Branch Execution Gating With Object ID Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Speculative execution in computer processors leads to security vulnerabilities such as Meltdown and Spectre, which can compromise the kernel of the operating system.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing static object identification numbers in memory addresses to prevent speculative execution into kernel objects, thereby enhancing security by aborting speculative execution when a memory address's object identification number differs from the previous instruction's, ensuring secure conditional speculative instruction execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If speculative execution is performed to improve processing speed, then productivity increases, but security reliability deteriorates due to vulnerabilities like Meltdown and Spectre

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsecurity reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by checking object identification numbers before speculative execution occurs. The system pre-identifies the object ID of the current instruction and compares it with the object ID of the target instruction before allowing speculative execution to proceed, preventing security vulnerabilities from occurring in the first place

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces object identification numbers as an intermediary mechanism between the instruction stream and the execution unit. This intermediary ID serves as a mediator that verifies whether speculative execution should be permitted, acting as a security gatekeeper without blocking legitimate performance optimizations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If object identification checking is implemented to prevent speculative execution attacks, then security reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the security verification function from the main execution path by using dedicated object identification numbers that are already present in the instruction stream. Rather than adding complex verification logic throughout the processor, the solution extracts and utilizes the embedded object IDs for security checking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by using the object identification numbers that are already embedded within the instruction stream itself. The instructions carry their own identity information, which they use to verify their own execution context, eliminating the need for external security verification infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12547411B2Securing conditional speculative instruction execution
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 LODESTAR LICENSING GROUP LLC
  • US12547411B2 patent drawing
  • US12547411B2 patent drawing
  • US12547411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method performed in a processor, includes: receiving, in the processor, a branch instruction in the processing; determining, by the processor, an address of an instruction after the branch instruction as a candidate for speculative execution, the address including an object identification and an offset; and determining, by the processor, whether or not to perform speculative execution of the instruction after the branch instruction based on the object identification of the address.