Speculative Execution Throttle Control Circuitry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In out-of-order processors, sophisticated branch prediction is required to minimize wasted processing and power on mispredicted branches, but this complexity and potential for high speculation costs lead to inefficiencies in speculative execution.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of path speculation cost calculation and throttle control circuitry to adjust the rate of instruction issuance based on the likelihood of branch misprediction, using confidence levels and speculation cost metrics to manage the number of in-flight instructions and reduce wasted power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sophisticated branch prediction is used to improve speculative execution accuracy, then the reliability of branch prediction improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebranch prediction accuracyVSAvoidbranch prediction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the processor monitors the accuracy of branch predictions and adjusts its behavior accordingly. When misprediction rates exceed thresholds, the system feeds back control signals to throttle instruction issuance, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to actual prediction performance without requiring increasingly complex prediction hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own performance data (misprediction rates, instruction flush counts) to automatically regulate its operation. The processor self-adjusts the instruction issuance rate based on internally monitored metrics, eliminating the need for external control or more complex prediction logic to achieve adaptive behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If speculative execution is performed to improve processing throughput, then the productivity increases, but the loss of energy increases due to wasted processing on mispredicted paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction processing throughputVSAvoidpower consumption on mispredicted instructions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the instruction issuance rate based on real-time monitoring of misprediction metrics. Rather than static speculation control, the processor continuously adapts the throughput of speculative instructions by varying the issuance rate according to current prediction accuracy, optimizing the balance between productivity and energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by issuing instructions at a controlled rate rather than maximum throughput. When misprediction indicators are detected, the system deliberately limits (throttles) the instruction issuance to avoid excessive speculative execution that would waste energy, performing only the necessary partial amount of speculative work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Speed

If the instruction issuance rate is increased to improve processing speed, then the speed increases, but the loss of time increases due to instruction flushing when mispredictions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction processing speedVSAvoidtime wasted on flushed instructions
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors instruction flush events and uses this feedback to adjust the issuance rate. When flushes occur indicating mispredictions, the feedback loop reduces the issuance rate to prevent future flushes, thereby reducing the time lost to re-execution and maintaining more steady progress through the instruction stream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares for potential mispredictions by throttling the instruction issuance rate in advance when early indicators of misprediction are detected. This cushioning approach prevents the processor from issuing too many instructions that would subsequently need to be flushed, thereby cushioning against the time loss that would result from mass flushing events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11003454B2Apparatus and method for speculative execution of instructions
Publication Date: 2021.05.11 ARM LTD
  • US11003454B2 patent drawing
  • US11003454B2 patent drawing
  • US11003454B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses for data processing and methods of data processing are provided. A data processing apparatus performs data processing operations in response to a sequence of instructions including performing speculative execution of at least some of the sequence of instructions. In response to a branch instruction the data processing apparatus predicts whether or not the branch is taken or not taken further speculative instruction execution is based on that prediction. A path speculation cost is calculated in dependence on a number of recently flushed instructions and a rate at which speculatively executed instructions are issued may be modified based on the path speculation cost.