Speculative Load False Dependency Resolution via Address Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Speculative load instructions in processors often result in false dependencies due to partial address matches during out-of-order execution, leading to reduced performance as full address comparisons increase latency and may incorrectly prevent load instructions from executing.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that compares the physical addresses of speculative load and store operations after determining potential dependency, using a combination of lower and upper address comparison logic to resolve dependencies efficiently, thereby reducing false dependency issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a full address comparison is performed to ensure load instruction independence, then dependency detection accuracy is improved, but execution latency increases and performance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedependency detection accuracyVSAvoidexecution latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the address comparison process into two distinct stages: a fast preliminary filter using a hash table that compares address prefixes, and a complete exact match comparison performed only when the filter indicates potential dependency. This segmentation allows most comparisons to complete quickly while ensuring accurate dependency detection only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial address comparison through hash table prefix matching as a sufficient but not necessary condition for dependency detection. By performing only partial comparison initially and escalating to full comparison only when the partial match suggests potential dependency, the system avoids excessive full comparisons while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Speed

If a partial address comparison is performed to reduce latency, then execution speed is improved, but false dependencies are generated and performance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution speedVSAvoidfalse dependency rate
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a hash table as an intermediary data structure that stores address prefixes and their associated metadata. This intermediary enables fast preliminary filtering by comparing only the prefix portion of addresses, significantly reducing the number of full comparisons needed while maintaining reliability through the structured organization of address information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical full-address-comparison system with a two-tiered approach using hash-based prefix matching. This substitution uses computational hashing mechanisms to quickly eliminate non-dependent addresses without requiring complete address comparison, thereby maintaining speed while reducing false dependencies through the mathematical properties of hash functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If speculative load instructions are executed out-of-order, then processor performance is improved, but false dependencies may incorrectly block execution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessor performanceVSAvoidexecution correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary dependency filtering using hash table prefix comparison before the speculative load instruction commits its results. By evaluating the address prefix match in advance and only allowing speculative execution when no potential dependency is detected, the system enables out-of-order execution while maintaining correctness through preliminary validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic dependency checking mechanism that adapts the level of comparison based on the hash table lookup results. When the prefix comparison indicates no potential dependency, the system dynamically allows speculative execution without further checking. When potential dependency is detected, the system dynamically escalates to full address comparison to ensure correctness, thus balancing performance and reliability dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7603527B2Resolving false dependencies of speculative load instructions
Publication Date: 2009.10.13 TAHOE RES LTD
  • US7603527B2 patent drawing
  • US7603527B2 patent drawing
  • US7603527B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for resolving false dependencies associated with speculatively executing load instructions in a processor core are described. In one embodiment, physical addresses of a load operation and a store operation are compared in response to a determination that the load operation may be potentially dependent on the store operation. Other embodiments are also described.