Speech Component Evaluation Using Synthetic User Inputs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing speech processing systems often produce undesired responses or errors due to misrecognition, misinterpretation, or misidentification of user inputs, which can be attributed to issues in automatic speech recognition (ASR), natural language understanding (NLU), and entity resolution (ER) processing.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for evaluating speech processing components using synthetic user inputs, allowing for offline evaluation of ASR, NLU, and ER tasks within a serverless computing framework, which includes generating and processing synthetic inputs to identify and reduce errors, and updating in-production components accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If speech processing systems use complex ASR, NLU, and ER processing to improve accuracy, then recognition and understanding quality improves, but system complexity and difficulty of detecting errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech recognition accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the speech processing system into distinct ASR, NLU, and ER processing stages, allowing independent evaluation of each component. This segmentation enables targeted testing and error identification without requiring evaluation of the entire complex system, thus managing complexity while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces synthetic user inputs as an intermediary mechanism for evaluation. These synthetic inputs serve as a mediator between the complex speech processing system and the evaluator, providing standardized test cases that can be systematically generated and processed to assess each component's performance independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the system processes real user inputs to improve responsiveness, then user experience improves, but error detection and system improvement slows down

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoiderror detection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by generating and preparing synthetic user inputs in advance for systematic evaluation. These pre-generated test inputs allow the system to be evaluated thoroughly before deployment or during maintenance, enabling error detection and component improvement without delaying real-time user interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses synthetic user inputs as copies or representations of real user inputs for evaluation purposes. These synthetic copies allow comprehensive testing of ASR, NLU, and ER processing without requiring actual user interactions, thus maintaining fast real-time response while enabling thorough error detection through repeated synthetic input processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the system continuously updates components to fix errors, then system reliability improves, but operational complexity and risk of introducing new errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidupdate management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where synthetic input processing results are systematically analyzed to identify errors in ASR, NLU, or ER processing. This feedback loop provides structured information about system performance and specific component failures, enabling targeted updates that improve reliability while managing update complexity through systematic error analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual error detection and component updating with an automated evaluation system using synthetic inputs. This substitution of mechanical evaluation processes with systematic synthetic data processing and analysis enables more reliable and manageable updates, as errors are identified through consistent, repeatable testing rather than ad-hoc analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12462798B1Evaluation of speech processing components
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12462798B1 patent drawing
  • US12462798B1 patent drawing
  • US12462798B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for evaluating speech processing components are described. A system may receive a task request including at least a plurality of entity names to be evaluated by at least one speech processing component. The system may determine synthetic user inputs corresponding to the plurality of entity names, and may cause performance of a speech processing task using the synthetic user inputs. The speech processing task may be an ASR processing task, an NLU processing task, or an ER processing task. The system may compare the results of the speech processing task with ground truth data to determine if an error occurred during processing.