Speech Encoding Modes and Rates via Closed-Loop Re-Decision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current speech coders face challenges in maintaining high voice quality at low bit rates, particularly in wireless telephony and satellite communications, where they often introduce perceptually significant distortion due to limited bit rates and channel errors.

Innovation Solution

A device that dynamically adjusts encoding modes and rates using closed-loop re-decision mechanisms, representing speech signals by amplitude and phase components to optimize bit allocation and improve quality, allowing for flexible switching between different encoding modes and rates based on real-time analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If speech is transmitted by simply sampling and digitizing, then speech quality is maintained at conventional analog telephone levels, but data rate increases to sixty-four kilobits per second

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech qualityVSAvoiddata rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed to represent speech by analyzing speech parameters (pitch, amplitude, spectral characteristics) and transmitting only these extracted features rather than the complete raw waveform, achieving compression while maintaining quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the speech signal from raw waveform data into transformed parameters (cepstral coefficients, spectral envelope, pitch period) that capture the essential speech characteristics with fewer bits, changing the representation to achieve compression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If speech compression is applied to reduce data rate, then data rate is significantly reduced, but voice quality deteriorates due to perceptually significant distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rateVSAvoidvoice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the receiver provides information about channel conditions and decoding results back to the transmitter, enabling adaptive adjustment of compression parameters to maintain quality while minimizing data rate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts compression parameters and speech coding modes based on real-time analysis of speech characteristics and channel conditions, allowing the system to optimize the balance between data rate and quality for each specific situation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If fixed encoding modes and rates are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to varying channel conditions and speech characteristics is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding system complexityVSAvoidadaptability to channel conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic mode selection where the encoder can switch between different speech coding modes (CELP, PPP, NELP) and encoding rates based on real-time analysis of speech characteristics and channel conditions, providing adaptability without requiring all modes to be simultaneously active

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the speech coding system into separate modular components (mode decision unit, encoding unit, rate control unit) that can independently operate and select from different modes, allowing flexibility while maintaining manageable complexity through functional separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8346544B2Selection of encoding modes and/or encoding rates for speech compression with closed loop re-decision
Publication Date: 2013.01.01 QUALCOMM INC
  • US8346544B2 patent drawing
  • US8346544B2 patent drawing
  • US8346544B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a device configurable to encode speech performing an closed loop re-decision may comprise representing a speech signal by amplitude components and phase components for a current frame and a past frame. In a first closed loop stage, a first set of compressed components and a first set of uncompressed components for a current frame may be generated. A first set of features may be generated by comparing current and past frame amplitude and/or phase components. In a second closed loop stage, a second set of compressed components for the current frame may be generated by compressing the first set of compressed components and compressing the first set of uncompressed components. Generation of a second set of features may be based on the second set of compressed components from the current frame and a combination of amplitude and/or phase components from the past frame.