Speech Recognition Error Correction via Acoustic-Text Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional speech recognition error correction methods require manual selection and input of correction, making the process cumbersome and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that utilize text and acoustic matching to automatically estimate and correct speech recognition errors by acquiring and converting spoken content, allowing for real-time correction of captions through text matching and acoustic analysis, enabling automated identification and replacement of incorrect character strings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual selection and input methods are used for correcting speech recognition errors, then correction accuracy can be maintained, but operational complexity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-correction by automatically detecting recognition errors and generating correction suggestions without requiring manual selection or input. The correction suggestion generation unit creates candidate corrections based on the recognized text and context, allowing the system to service itself rather than relying on manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual input process (keyboard typing, mouse selection) with an automated information processing system. The correction suggestion generation unit substitutes the mechanical interaction between user and system with an automated algorithmic process that analyzes recognition results and generates corrections programmatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual correction processes are used, then precise error identification is possible, but time consumption and operational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror identification accuracyVSAvoidcorrection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the recognized text to identify potential errors before final correction is applied. The correction suggestion generation unit proactively generates correction suggestions based on the recognition result, preparing corrections in advance rather than waiting for manual error identification after the fact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the speech recognition process itself to identify and correct errors. The correction suggestion generation unit analyzes the recognition result and generates corrections based on this feedback, creating a closed-loop system where recognition outcomes inform subsequent correction actions automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated correction is implemented, then operational efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the correction process into distinct functional units: the correction suggestion generation unit that creates candidate corrections, and the correction suggestion output unit that presents these suggestions. This segmentation allows automated correction functionality to be added as modular components rather than requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The correction suggestion generation unit acts as an intermediary between the speech recognition process and the final correction output. Rather than directly implementing complex automated correction, the system introduces this intermediate layer that generates suggestions, which then can be reviewed or automatically applied, mediating between automation and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10614265B2Apparatus, method, and computer program product for correcting speech recognition error
Publication Date: 2020.04.07 KK TOSHIBA
  • US10614265B2 patent drawing
  • US10614265B2 patent drawing
  • US10614265B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for correcting a character string in a text of an embodiment includes a first converter, a first output unit, a second converter, an estimation unit, and a second output unit. The first converter recognizes a first speech of a first speaker, and converts the first speech to a first text. The first output unit outputs a first caption image indicating the first text. The second converter recognizes a second speech of a second speaker for correcting a character string to be corrected in the first text, and converts the second speech to a second text. The estimation unit estimates the character string to be corrected, based on text matching between the first text and the second text. The second output unit outputs a second caption image indicating that the character string to be corrected is to be replaced with the second text.