Speech Recognition Model Adaptation via Error Rate Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Speech recognition systems face inefficiencies due to errors caused by background noise, user unfamiliarity, and misuse, leading to resource wastage in adaptation processes, particularly in battery-powered devices, where adaptation can degrade performance and consume significant resources.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method to control the adaptation of speech recognition models using error rate determinations as triggers, which adjust model adaptation based on error rates, preventing undesirable adaptations and optimizing resource use by only adapting when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous model adaptation is performed to improve speech recognition accuracy, then recognition accuracy improves, but resource consumption (power, computational, storage) increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech recognition accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by monitoring error rates from speech recognition outcomes and using this feedback to control when model adaptation should occur. The error rate serves as a feedback signal that triggers adaptation only when performance degradation is detected, rather than performing continuous adaptation. This resolves the contradiction by making the system respond to actual performance needs rather than operating continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the adaptation process based on real-time error rate conditions. When error rates exceed thresholds, adaptation is activated; when error rates are acceptable, adaptation is suspended. This dynamic control allows the system to optimize between accuracy and power consumption by adapting only when necessary, rather than maintaining a static continuous adaptation mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If model adaptation is performed frequently to maintain accuracy, then speech recognition accuracy improves, but computational resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech recognition accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The error rate monitoring provides feedback that controls the adaptation trigger, ensuring computational resources are used only when performance degradation occurs. This feedback mechanism prevents wasteful adaptation when the system is already performing accurately, thus improving computational efficiency while maintaining necessary accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of adaptation frequency based on error rate thresholds. Instead of fixed frequent adaptation, the adaptation frequency parameter is dynamically adjusted according to actual performance needs, reducing unnecessary computational work while maintaining accuracy when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If model adaptation is performed to improve accuracy, then speech recognition accuracy improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech recognition accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism using error rate monitoring adds a control layer that manages when adaptation occurs. While this introduces some complexity, it prevents the greater complexity of continuous adaptation by providing intelligent control, thus achieving a balance where the system remains manageable while improving accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If model adaptation is performed continuously to handle background noise and user unfamiliarity, then robustness improves, but loss of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverobustnessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The error rate feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain robustness by adapting only when performance degradation is detected due to background noise or user unfamiliarity. This prevents continuous energy-consuming adaptation while still providing robustness when actually needed, thus resolving the contradiction between robustness and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically responds to changing conditions by activating adaptation only when error rates indicate performance problems. This dynamic behavior allows the system to maintain robustness adaptively rather than through continuous energy-consuming operations, optimizing the balance between robustness and energy conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9202458B2Methods and systems for adapting a model for a speech recognition system
Publication Date: 2015.12.01 VOCOLLECT INC
  • US9202458B2 patent drawing
  • US9202458B2 patent drawing
  • US9202458B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for model adaptation for a speech recognition system includes determining an error rate, corresponding to either recognition of instances of a word or recognition of instances of various words, without using a transcript of words input to the system. The method may further include adjusting an adaptation, of the model for the word or various models for the various words, based on the error rate. Apparatus are disclosed for identifying possible errors made by a speech recognition system without using a transcript of words input to the system. An apparatus for model adaptation for a speech recognition system includes a processor adapted to estimate an error rate, corresponding to either recognition of instances of a word or recognition of instances of various words, without using a transcript of words input to the system. The apparatus may further include a controller adapted to adjust an adaptation of the model for the word or various models for the various words, based on the error rate.