Speech Training Device Using High-Pass Noise to Suppress Lombard Effect

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge is to create a training device that prevents the Lombard effect during utterance training, allowing the subject to concentrate on auditory feedback without unnecessary changes in voice characteristics, while also enabling effective recognition of voice identity.

Innovation Solution

The device includes a signal analysis unit to determine formant frequencies, a conversion unit that applies a lowpass filter with specific cutoff frequencies, a noise addition unit that adds high-pass noise, and an evaluation unit to assess compensatory responses, ensuring the subject receives feedback that does not induce the Lombard effect and allows for focused attention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feedback speech sound is generated in a noise environment, then the subject's attention can be maintained, but Lombard effect occurs causing unnecessary utterance changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubject's concentration of attentionVSAvoidLombard effect
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful Lombard effect into a beneficial training mechanism by intentionally adding high-pass noise to feedback speech sound. This controlled noise exposure trains the subject to maintain stable utterances despite adverse acoustic conditions, transforming the previously harmful Lombard response into a useful adaptation exercise that improves speech stability in noisy environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the acoustic parameters of feedback speech sound by adding high-pass noise with specific frequency characteristics. This parameter modification allows the system to control the degree of noise exposure and adjust the training intensity, enabling the subject to adapt to noisy conditions without triggering unwanted Lombard effects through gradual parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If feedback speech sound is generated without noise, then Lombard effect is prevented, but the subject's attention concentration is impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLombard effect preventionVSAvoidsubject's concentration of attention
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding high-pass noise specifically to certain frequency components of the feedback speech sound while maintaining other components clear. This selective noise application allows the subject to focus attention on specific frequency ranges while adapting to noise in others, preventing overall Lombard effect while maintaining attention concentration through targeted acoustic challenges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If formant frequencies are changed in feedback, then compensatory response is observed, but other utterance features may be unnecessarily altered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformant frequency controlVSAvoidunnecessary utterance change
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the speech signal processing into distinct frequency bands, applying formant frequency changes to specific bands while adding high-pass noise to other bands. This segmentation allows independent control of formant manipulation and noise addition, enabling precise formant frequency control for training compensatory response while preventing unnecessary alterations in other utterance features through isolated frequency band processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables effective utterance training by preventing the Lombard effect and allowing the subject to concentrate on auditory feedback, while maintaining the ability to recognize voice identity and produce clear, stable utterances.

Implementation Method 1

a conversion unit that applies a lowpass filter with a cutoff frequency being a first predetermined value with or without change of feedback formant frequencies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLowpass filtering: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

a noise addition unit that adds high-pass noise to the converted speech signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHigh-pass noise addition: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 3

a feedback unit that feeds back the converted speech signal with the high-pass noise added to a subject

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic feedback: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS11783846B2Training apparatus, method of the same and program
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP
  • US11783846B2 patent drawing
  • US11783846B2 patent drawing
  • US11783846B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A training device changes feedback formant frequencies which are formant frequencies of a picked-up speech signal, applies a lowpass filter, converts the picked-up speech signal, adds high-pass noise to the converted speech signal, feeds back the converted speech signal with the high-pass noise added to a subject, calculates a compensatory response vector by using pickup formant frequencies which are formant frequencies of a speech signal acquired by picking up an utterance made by the subject while feeding back a speech signal that has been converted with change of the feedback formant frequencies to the subject, and pickup formant frequencies which are formant frequencies of a speech signal acquired by picking up an utterance made by the subject while feeding back a speech signal that has been converted without change of the feedback formant frequencies to the subject, and determines an evaluation based on the compensatory response vector and a correct compensatory response vector.