Vehicle Speed Profile Validation for Energy Optimization Errors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle propulsion control systems are unable to optimize energy consumption efficiently, leading to errors in determining optimized target vehicle speed profiles due to calculation faults or errors, and lack the capability to adjust vehicle speed for energy efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that determine an alternative target vehicle speed profile independently of the optimized profile, using route characteristics, vehicle parameters, and historical data to validate the optimization logic and adjust vehicle speed for energy efficiency, including displaying recommendations to the operator.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If vehicle propulsion control systems use optimized speed profile calculation, then energy consumption efficiency is improved, but calculation faults and errors occur due to system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumption efficiencyVSAvoidcalculation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation by determining an alternative target vehicle speed profile independently before comparing it with the optimized profile. This preliminary calculation serves as a sanity check to detect obvious errors in the optimization logic before they cause problematic vehicle operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by comparing the alternative speed profile with the optimized speed profile and using this comparison to validate the optimization results. If discrepancies exceed a threshold, the system triggers a rationality check to prevent erroneous speed commands from being executed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system determines alternative target vehicle speed profile independently for validation, then reliability of optimized profile is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary validation layer that compares independently calculated alternative speed profiles with optimized profiles. This intermediary check acts as a mediator between the optimization algorithm and the vehicle control system, detecting errors without requiring complete redesign of the control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified copy of the speed profile determination process that operates independently to generate alternative target speeds. This copy uses the same input data (route characteristics, vehicle parameters, historical data) but through a different computational path, enabling validation without duplicating the entire complex optimization system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If the system performs rationality check by comparing speed profiles, then errors are prevented, but loss of time occurs in speed profile determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror preventionVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial validation by comparing only critical aspects of the alternative and optimized speed profiles rather than进行全面 verification. The rationality check focuses on detecting obvious errors and inconsistencies, performing sufficient validation to prevent harmful errors while avoiding exhaustive checking that would cause excessive time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the alternative profile determination and validation processes into an integrated workflow that shares computational resources and data structures. By combining these functions, the system reduces redundant calculations and minimizes the total time required for both profile determination and validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240253623A1Systems and methods for validating a rationality of an optimized vehicle speed profile for a route
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 BORGWARNER US TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US20240253623A1 patent drawing
  • US20240253623A1 patent drawing
  • US20240253623A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for providing a vehicle energy optimization rationality check includes identifying at least one route characteristic of a portion of a route being traversed by a vehicle, determining a vehicle energy consumption profile for the vehicle, determining a profile for a target vehicle speed based on the at least one route characteristic and the vehicle energy consumption profile, determining, based on at least the at least one route characteristic, an alternative target vehicle speed, and, in response to a difference between the target vehicle speed and the alternative vehicle speed being greater than a threshold, performing a default action.