Sperm Gene Expression Screening for Faster MAP Selection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional spermatozoon selection methods at high magnification are time-consuming and subject to human subjectivity, making them inefficient and costly, while existing methods for male infertility do not provide clear indications for sperm selection.
Innovation Solution
A method involving the extraction of nucleic acids from spermatozoa to measure the expression level of specific marker genes (AURKA, CFAP46, CCDC60, CCDC88B, HDAC4, CACNA1C, CACNA1H, CARHSP1, DNAH2, and SPATA18) and determining expression differentials to select spermatozoa at appropriate magnifications for fertilization.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If spermatozoon selection is performed at high magnification to identify morphological indicators, then the accuracy of sperm selection is improved, but the time required for selection increases significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by performing morphological evaluation of spermatozoa before the actual ICSI procedure. Sperm samples are pre-screened using automated image analysis systems that capture and evaluate sperm morphology at high magnification in advance, allowing clinicians to identify suitable spermatozoa beforehand and reduce the time required during the actual injection procedure.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces manual microscopic examination with automated image analysis systems. These systems use digital imaging and computer-based morphological evaluation to objectively assess spermatozoa, eliminating the time-consuming manual inspection process while maintaining or improving selection accuracy through consistent, standardized criteria.
2Reliability
If manual morphological evaluation by biologists is used, then expert judgment is applied, but human subjectivity introduces variability in evaluation
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces subjective manual evaluation by biologists with automated image analysis systems that apply standardized morphological criteria consistently. These systems capture sperm images and automatically assess morphological features using predefined parameters, eliminating inter-observer variability and ensuring uniform evaluation standards across different samples and operators.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the automated system continuously refines its evaluation based on established morphological criteria and known successful outcomes. The system provides objective, quantifiable measurements of sperm morphology that can be tracked and validated, creating a feedback loop that ensures consistent application of selection standards.
3Manufacturing precision
If high magnification selection is performed for all cases, then the best possible sperm selection is achieved, but the cost and complexity of the procedure increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by performing high-magnification morphological evaluation only for sperm samples that require enhanced selection, rather than universally applying the most complex methodology to all cases. The system allows clinicians to select the appropriate level of evaluation based on individual patient needs, sample characteristics, and clinical indications, optimizing resource utilization.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent enables flexible adjustment of evaluation parameters and magnification levels based on specific clinical requirements. The automated system can adapt its assessment criteria and imaging parameters to match the particular characteristics of each sperm sample and clinical scenario, providing optimized selection without unnecessarily increasing complexity for all cases.
Data Source
AI summary
The present invention relates to a method for analysing a spermatozoon, comprising a step of extracting the nucleic acids from the spermatozoa contained in a first sample of spermatozoa previously obtained from a human subject; a step of measuring the level of expression of at least one marker gene chosen from the group consisting of AURKA, CFAP46, CCDC60, CCDC88B, HDAC4, CACNA1C, CACNA1H, CARHSP1, DNAH2 and SPATA18 from the extracted nucleic acids; and a step of determining the existence of an expression differential of the at least one marker gene in relation to a control. It also relates to a method for selecting spermatozoa and a method for evaluating the quality of a sperm.
