Adaptable Spike Detection Algorithm for Dynamic Resource Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) face challenges in timely and accurate identification of breaches or vulnerabilities due to excessive resource consumption by spike detection tools, leading to performance degradation and delayed critical alerts.

Innovation Solution

The system adapts a spike detection algorithm by monitoring constraint metrics in the computing environment, generating an adapted detection algorithm to reduce resource utilization, and executing it to detect abnormal events, thereby optimizing resource usage and improving alert timeliness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a spike detection tool is implemented in an IDS, then anomaly detection capability is improved, but resource consumption increases causing performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of the spike detection algorithm based on real-time constraint metrics. The system monitors resource consumption and automatically adjusts detection parameters, algorithm complexity, and monitoring intensity to match available system resources, resolving the contradiction between maintaining detection capability and preserving system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes detection parameters dynamically based on constraint metrics. When resource constraints are detected, the system modifies algorithm parameters such as detection sensitivity, sampling frequency, and processing intensity to reduce resource consumption while maintaining adequate anomaly detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a spike detection tool is implemented in an IDS, then anomaly detection capability is improved, but processing time increases causing delayed alerts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection capabilityVSAvoidalert generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts detection intensity and processing speed based on real-time constraints. When system resources are constrained, the algorithm automatically reduces processing depth and updates detection thresholds to enable faster alert generation without sacrificing critical anomaly detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic monitoring and adaptive updates of detection algorithms. Instead of continuous heavy processing, the system performs periodic constraint metric collection and algorithm adaptation cycles, reducing processing time while maintaining detection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If resource consumption is reduced by simplifying the detection algorithm, then system performance is improved, but detection accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes algorithm parameters adaptively based on constraint metrics. When resources are abundant, more complex algorithms with higher accuracy are deployed. When resources are constrained, the system switches to simplified algorithms with adjusted parameters that maintain adequate accuracy for the available computational power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial detection algorithms that focus on the most critical detection tasks rather than attempting comprehensive analysis. This selective approach maintains sufficient detection accuracy for security purposes while significantly reducing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12282547B2Adaptable framework for spike detection under dynamic constraints
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12282547B2 patent drawing
  • US12282547B2 patent drawing
  • US12282547B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, apparatuses, and computer-readable storage mediums are described for adapting a spike detection algorithm. A first detection algorithm that monitors a first set of events in a computing environment is executed. A set of constraint metrics in the computing environment are monitored. Based on the monitored set of constraint metrics, a second detection algorithm is generated. The second detection algorithm is an adapted version of the first detection algorithm and is configured to monitor a second set of events in the computing environment. The second detection algorithm is executed, and a remediation action is performed in response to an abnormal event detected in the computing environment by the second detection algorithm.