Spin Column Testing for Frac Fluid Recovery Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for optimizing fluid recovery in oil and gas exploration, such as hydraulic fracturing, lack effective tools for customizing frac fluid components and surfactants based on well conditions, leading to inefficient fluid interactions and clean-up procedures.

Innovation Solution

A column flow testing system using a spin column with multiple layers of materials, including proppant, brine, and crude oil, subjected to centrifugation or vacuum pressure to simulate downhole conditions, allowing for the evaluation of fluid recovery and interaction with well formations, enabling tailored frac fluid and surfactant selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fluid recovery optimization methods are used, then general fluid selection is possible, but precise differentiation and optimization of frac fluid and surfactant compositions based on well conditions cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid recovery measurement precisionVSAvoidcolumn flow testing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system is segmented into multiple columns, each containing different proppant materials and configurations. This allows parallel testing of multiple fluid formulations against different formation materials, enabling precise differentiation of fluid performance without requiring a single complex apparatus

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spin column apparatus creates simplified copies of downhole conditions through centrifugal force. By replicating the essential physical environment (pressure, flow dynamics) in a controlled laboratory setting, the system enables accurate fluid evaluation without needing to perform actual downhole testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If hydraulic fracturing operations use standardized fluid components, then operational simplicity is maintained, but customization of frac fluid and surfactants based on specific well conditions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid composition adaptabilityVSAvoidfluid recovery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables selection of fluids with properties specifically matched to local well conditions. By testing multiple surfactant concentrations and fluid formulations against formation materials from specific wells, the optimal fluid composition can be customized for each location, improving recovery efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The testing methodology systematically varies key parameters including surfactant concentration, fluid viscosity, and proppant size to determine their effect on fluid recovery. This parametric approach identifies optimal formulations for specific well conditions, enhancing both adaptability and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If downhole conditions are directly tested for fluid evaluation, then accurate fluid interaction data is obtained, but operational complexity and risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid interaction prediction accuracyVSAvoidtesting procedure simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spin column serves as an intermediary system that bridges laboratory conditions and actual downhole environments. By using centrifugal force to simulate downhole pressure and flow conditions in a controlled setting, accurate fluid interaction data can be obtained without the complexity and risk of actual field testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise differentiation and optimization of frac fluid and surfactant compositions, improving fluid recovery and clean-up efficiency by simulating downhole conditions and predicting fluid interactions, thus enhancing production processes.

Implementation Method 1

A spin column apparatus can be used to simulate downhole conditions and flow a fluid through a column bed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

A column flow testing system using a spin column with multiple layers of materials, including proppant, brine, and crude oil, subjected to centrifugation or vacuum pressure to simulate downhole conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum pressure: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS10161242B2Column flow testing
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US10161242B2 patent drawing
  • US10161242B2 patent drawing
  • US10161242B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System and method for monitoring frac fluid flow through a column bed includes preparing a vessel (112, 440) with a column including a filtering member (120, 420), a column bed (114, 414) simulating a downhole environment, and a frac fluid (116, 416). Frac fluid (116, 416) is flowed through the column bed (114, 414) at an acceleration exceeding gravity for a predetermined period of time. The amount of liquid that flows through the column bed (114, 414) and that is recovered after the predetermined period of time is then determined.