Low Bed-Volume Spin Column System for High-Throughput Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spin column devices are limited by large bed volumes, susceptibility to air entrainment, and drying issues, which affect flow rate variability and binding capacity, making them unsuitable for high-throughput and precise analysis in microplate formats.

Innovation Solution

A low bed-volume spin column system comprising a rack, receiver plate, and spin columns with a packed bed volume capacity at least 5-fold lower than the microplate well, designed to prevent air entrainment and drying, allowing for efficient quantitative binding and elution in a high-throughput manner.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional spin column devices are used with large bed volumes, then they can handle larger sample volumes, but they suffer from air entrainment and drying issues that increase flow rate variability and reduce binding capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample volume capacityVSAvoidflow rate consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the bed volume parameter from conventional large volumes to low bed volumes (at least 5-fold lower than microplate well volume). This parameter change fundamentally alters the system's susceptibility to air entrainment and drying, improving flow rate consistency while maintaining sample handling capability through optimized low-volume design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If conventional spin column devices are used, then they can perform basic separation functions, but they are unsuitable for high-throughput analysis in microplate formats due to large size and air entrainment susceptibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebasic separation functionVSAvoidhigh-throughput analysis capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the spin column system into modular components that can be integrated with microplate formats. The low bed-volume columns are designed to work within microplate wells, enabling parallel processing of multiple samples simultaneously. This segmentation allows the system to maintain basic separation functions while achieving high-throughput capability through microplate-based parallelization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from conventional vertical spin column geometry to a microplate-integrated format that utilizes the horizontal well structure of microplates. This dimensional change enables the spin columns to be arranged in parallel across multiple wells, facilitating high-throughput analysis while maintaining the essential separation function through optimized low-volume column design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If low bed-volume spin columns are used, then air entrainment and drying are minimized improving flow rate consistency, but the packed bed volume is reduced which may limit binding capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate consistencyVSAvoidbinding capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the packed bed volume parameter to be at least 5-fold lower than the microplate well volume, creating a low bed-volume system that minimizes air entrainment and drying. This parameter change improves flow rate consistency while the binding capacity is maintained through optimized resin density and surface area within the reduced volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables high-throughput, precise analysis with reduced variability and increased efficiency by using a modular system that minimizes air entrainment and drying, allowing for the analysis of analytes in conventional microplates with improved reproducibility and sensitivity.

Implementation Method 1

The rack, spin column, and receiver plate are dimensioned and configured to suspend an outlet tip of the spin column within 5 mm of a bottom surface of the well

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP2454600B1Spin column system and methods
Publication Date: 2018.11.28 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP2454600B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP2454600B1 patent drawingFigure 5~8
  • EP2454600B1 patent drawingFigure 9

AI summary

The present invention provides a low bed-volume spin column system and methods of use. The system includes various combinations of spin columns with packed beds (17), a rack (50) for holding the spin columns (10), a receiver plate (30) that attaches to the rack (50) and that has wells (40) in registration with the spin columns (10) held in the rack (50), a lid (70) that attaches to the receiver plate (30) and seals the spin columns (10), and an incubator block (80) configured for accepting the wells (40) of the receiver plate (30) and for incubating the packed bed (17). The lid (70), spin columns (10), rack (50), receiver plate (30), and incubator block (80) are preferably capable of being assembled in a nested configuration. In preferred versions of the invention, the rack (50) is compatible with and attachable to conventional 96-well microplates (20). Further provided are methods of using the spin column system that include quantitatively purifying and analyzing an analyte, removing and preventing air entrainment within the packed bed (17), and incubating the packed bed while preventing drying thereof.