Spinal Orthotic Backrest Structure for Stable Vertebral Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional backrests fail to provide proper and stable support for thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, lead to incorrect sitting postures, occupy excessive space, and lack features like acupressure and electrotherapy, ultimately causing muscle fatigue and improper vertebral alignment.

Innovation Solution

A portable spinal orthotic backrest with a plastic back support plate featuring upper and lower portions conforming to thoracic and lumbar curvatures, protruding knobs for acupressure, suspension braces for resilience, a cervical vertebrae support plate with height adjustment, and embedded conductive elements for electrotherapy, ensuring proper vertebral alignment and muscle relaxation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional backrests use foam cushions to simulate support, then users feel comfortable initially, but the support becomes unstable and causes improper vertebral positioning after long-term use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The backrest is divided into multiple functional segments: a rigid support board providing structural stability, and separate foam cushions positioned only at contact points for comfort. This segmentation allows the rigid board to maintain proper vertebral positioning while the foam cushions provide localized comfort without compromising support stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of uniformly soft foam cushions throughout, the invention applies foam cushions only at specific local areas where user contact occurs. The rigid support board provides stable support in areas requiring structural integrity, while foam cushions provide comfort only where needed, resolving the contradiction between stability and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If conventional backrests use bulky foam cushions, then comfort is provided, but excessive sitting space is occupied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesitting spaceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The backrest separates the support function (rigid board) from the comfort function (foam cushions), allowing the rigid board to be thin and space-efficient while foam cushions are minimized to only necessary contact areas, thus reducing overall space occupation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a thin rigid support board instead of bulky foam structures, creating a compact backrest that occupies minimal sitting space while still providing effective support through its rigid structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If conventional backrests use hard boards without foam, then structural stability is maintained, but user comfort and muscle relaxation are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidsupport stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies foam cushions only at specific local contact areas where user comfort is needed, while the rigid support board maintains structural stability in areas requiring support. This localized application of foam resolves the contradiction by providing comfort only where it aids muscle relaxation without compromising overall support stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If conventional backrests lack acupressure features, then structural simplicity is maintained, but muscle relaxation and vertebral fine-tuning are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemuscle relaxationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the support function of the rigid board with the muscle relaxation function of foam cushions that have acupressure knobs integrated into them. This combination allows the backrest to provide both structural support and therapeutic muscle relaxation without requiring separate devices, thus managing complexity while enhancing functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9192238B2Portable spinal orthotic backrest
Publication Date: 2015.11.24 HO HOI MING MICHAEL
  • US9192238B2 patent drawing
  • US9192238B2 patent drawing
  • US9192238B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is to provide a back support plate, which is integrally formed of plastic and includes an upper portion with an inner-side having a vertical curvature and a horizontal curvature that respectively conform to the curvature of human thoracic vertebrae and a horizontal curvature of the human back corresponding in position to the thoracic vertebrae, and a lower portion with an inner-side having a vertical curvature and a horizontal curvature that respectively conform to the curvature of human lumbar vertebrae and a horizontal curvature of the human back corresponding in position to the lumbar vertebrae. The two inner-sides are protrudingly provided with a plurality of protruding knobs which correspond in position to two lateral sides of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and have upwardly and downwardly decreasing widths, respectively, such that the joining section between the two portions extends to the two lateral sides of the human back.