Spinal Implant Barrier Prevents Tissue Adhesion and Wear Debris

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Spinal implants that aim to preserve spinal motion lead to increased risks of implant failure due to tissue growth, scar formation, and wear debris, necessitating additional surgeries with high risks, as current methods do not effectively prevent tissue interaction or contain wear debris effectively.

Innovation Solution

The use of biological barriers around spinal implants to prevent tissue invasion, reduce scar formation, and contain wear debris, thereby minimizing the likelihood of implant failure and the need for revision surgery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If anterior approach is used to implant motion preservation devices, then direct access to vertebral disc space is achieved, but risk of vascular injury and scar formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to disc spaceVSAvoidvascular injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A barrier device is introduced as an intermediary element between the surgical site and surrounding tissues. The barrier prevents direct contact between scar-forming tissues and the implant, thereby reducing vascular injury risk and scar formation while maintaining anterior access benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If motion preservation devices are used to maintain spinal mobility, then segmental mobility is preserved, but tissue growth into implant increases causing failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal mobilityVSAvoidimplant function
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier device serves as a mediator that allows the implant to maintain spinal mobility while preventing harmful tissue interaction. The barrier physically separates the mobile implant from surrounding soft tissues, eliminating the pathway for tissue ingrowth while preserving the implant's motion-preserving function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If larger dissection field is created for motion preservation device placement, then implant placement is facilitated, but scar formation and tissue invasion increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant placementVSAvoidscar formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier device is positioned within the dissection field to create a controlled interface between the implant and surrounding tissues. This intermediary structure facilitates implant placement while simultaneously preventing scar formation by blocking the pathway for tissue invasion, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of placement and harmful tissue reactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If wear debris is not contained, then implant function deteriorates, but no containment mechanism is provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant functionVSAvoidwear debris toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier device acts as a containment mechanism that intercepts wear debris generated by the mobile implant. By positioning the barrier between the implant and surrounding tissues, it prevents debris from migrating into adjacent soft tissues and bone, thereby maintaining implant function and reducing toxic effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7578834B2Devices and methods for the preservation of spinal prosthesis function
Publication Date: 2009.08.25 ABDOU M S
  • US7578834B2 patent drawing
  • US7578834B2 patent drawing
  • US7578834B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A barrier is placed across a portion of or across the totality of a spinal implant. The barrier can serve a variety of purposes, including, for example: (1) to keep tissue away from the implant and minimize or eliminate the likelihood of tissue adhesion with the spine or implant; (2) to decrease or eliminate the likelihood of tissue growth, migration, invasion and/or interaction with the implant; (3) to decrease or eliminate the likelihood of the dissemination of implant wear debris and particles away from the implant and into body cavities; and (4) to decrease or eliminate the likelihood of calcification, ossification, and/or bone formation adjacent to the implant.