Spinal Nerve Decompression via Sequential Dilation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical technologies face challenges in effectively treating spinal nerve compression caused by conditions like osteoarthritis, spinal disc degeneration, and ligament thickening, which often result in pain and numbness, as they struggle to minimize tissue damage and trauma during decompression procedures.

Innovation Solution

A dilation system comprising a series of instruments and a visualization system that allows for sequential dilation of anatomical features along the spine, enabling minimal trauma access to treatment sites through a working cannula, with instruments like reamer instruments and cannula assemblies designed for precise tissue alteration and visualization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional open decompression procedures are used to effectively treat spinal nerve compression, then adequate access to treatment sites is achieved, but tissue damage and trauma are significantly increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to treatment siteVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The procedure is divided into multiple sequential steps using a series of progressively larger dilators (e.g., 4mm, 6mm, 8mm, 10mm, 12mm dilators). Each dilator creates a slightly larger opening than the previous one, allowing gradual access to the treatment site without sudden large-scale tissue disruption. This segmented approach enables effective decompression while minimizing trauma compared to single-step open surgery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple dilators and instruments are nested within each other during the procedure. Smaller dilators are inserted first, then progressively larger dilators are inserted through the previous ones. This nested configuration allows systematic enlargement of the access pathway while maintaining control and minimizing tissue damage at each stage, resolving the contradiction between adequate access and tissue preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If sequential dilation is performed to minimize tissue trauma, then patient discomfort and recovery time are reduced, but the complexity of the procedure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue traumaVSAvoidprocedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dilation system uses a standardized series of dilators that can be applied across different spinal decompression procedures and patient anatomies. Each dilator in the series serves multiple functions: creating the initial access pathway, enlarging the opening progressively, and preparing the site for instrument insertion. This universal multi-functional design reduces overall procedural complexity despite the sequential nature of the steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The procedure systematically changes the diameter parameter of the dilators in a controlled sequence (e.g., 4mm to 12mm). This parameter-based progression provides a simple, repeatable framework that guides the operator through the complex task of gradual tissue enlargement. By focusing on a single changing parameter (diameter), the system manages complexity while achieving minimal trauma through progressive dilation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Length of moving object

If larger openings are created to facilitate instrument delivery, then access to deep treatment sites is improved, but collateral tissue disruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveopening sizeVSAvoidcollateral tissue disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The opening enlargement is segmented into multiple small incremental steps using progressively larger dilators. Rather than creating a large opening in one step that causes significant collateral disruption, the system creates a series of small enlargements (e.g., 2mm increments). Each step allows tissue to adapt gradually, minimizing shear forces and collateral damage while achieving the necessary final opening size for instrument delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dilators perform preliminary action by preparing the tissue pathway before the actual decompression instruments are inserted. The sequential dilation process pre-enlarges the opening just enough to accommodate the treatment instruments, creating a controlled access pathway that minimizes sudden tissue disruption when the therapeutic instruments are introduced. This preliminary enlargement action resolves the contradiction between adequate access and tissue preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12035884B2Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 BOSTON SCI NEUROMODULATION CORP
  • US12035884B2 patent drawing
  • US12035884B2 patent drawing
  • US12035884B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for treating spinal nerve compression includes sequential dilation to position an instrument cannula along a patient's spine. Instruments can be delivered through the instrument cannula to remove targeted tissue for a decompression procedure. One of the instruments can be a reamer instrument configured to abrade, cut, or otherwise affect tissue along the patient's spine.