Spinal Fixation Implant with Flexible Rods and Crosslink

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal fixation implants may not be ideal for all situations, particularly in promoting fusion and allowing relative movement of vertebrae, as they lack flexibility and optimal anchoring to spinous processes.

Innovation Solution

A spinal implant design featuring two pairs of mounting plates with teeth for secure attachment to spinous processes, interconnected rods with a lower flexural modulus for flexibility, and a crosslink or elastic band to prevent rod separation, allowing for small vertebral movement and promoting fusion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid mounting plates are used to securely anchor to spinous processes, then anchoring strength is improved, but flexibility and ability to promote fusion deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchoring strengthVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into distinct components with different mechanical properties: rigid mounting plates for anchoring and flexible rods for motion accommodation. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function optimally without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the implant have different local mechanical properties - the mounting plates are made rigid for strong anchoring to spinous processes, while the rods are made flexible to accommodate vertebral motion and promote fusion. Each component's local quality is optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If rigid structure is used to provide stable fixation, then stability is improved, but ability to allow relative vertebral movement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation stabilityVSAvoidrelative vertebral movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The implant transitions from a completely rigid structure to a dynamic system where the flexible rods can bend and deform elastically in response to vertebral motion. This allows the implant to maintain stable fixation while accommodating physiological movement and promoting fusion through controlled micromotion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The implant provides stable fixation while allowing for limited vertebral movement, enhancing fusion outcomes by securely anchoring to spinous processes and accommodating natural spinal motion.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of teeth on a first medial face configured to bite into a spinous process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The first and second rods have a flexural modulus that is less than a flexural modulus of the mounting plates. The rod flexibility allows a small amount of relative movement of the vertebrae, which may be helpful in promoting fusion.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8657855B2Spinal fixation implant for mounting to spinous processes and related method
Publication Date: 2014.02.25 WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC INC
  • US8657855B2 patent drawing
  • US8657855B2 patent drawing
  • US8657855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spinal implant has two pairs of mounting plates or “staples,” two rods, and a crosslink. Each mounting plate mounts to a lateral side of a spinous process. Each rod interconnects a pair of mounting plates. The crosslink is disposed through the interspinous space and interconnects the rods. The crosslink hinders movement of the rods away from each other. The rods have a flexural modulus less than the mounting plates. The rod flexibility allows a small amount of relative movement of the vertebrae, which may be helpful in promoting fusion.