Spinal Fusion Barrier Material for Osteogenic Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal fusion methods face challenges in maintaining effective delivery and retention of osteogenic materials within the interbody space, particularly in minimally-invasive procedures where access is limited, leading to potential migration of these materials and suboptimal fusion outcomes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves providing surgical access to the interbody space through openings in the disc annulus, delivering a loadbearing spinal spacer and an osteogenic substance, along with a barrier material to inhibit migration of the osteogenic substance, using cannulated devices and syringe systems for precise placement, with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein and resorbable polymers as key components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If minimally-invasive surgical approaches are used to access the interbody space, then patient trauma is reduced and recovery is accelerated, but surgical access is limited and osteogenic material retention is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical accessibilityVSAvoidosteogenic material retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A barrier material is introduced as an intermediary substance between the osteogenic material and the opening in the disc annulus. This barrier material physically blocks the migration path of osteogenic material through the opening while allowing the minimally-invasive approach to be maintained, thus resolving the contradiction between surgical accessibility and material retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If osteogenic material is delivered through limited access openings, then minimally-invasive benefits are achieved, but material migration outside the interbody space occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminimally-invasive procedureVSAvoidosteogenic material migration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier material is delivered in advance to block the opening in the disc annulus before osteogenic material migration can occur. This preliminary protective action prevents the harmful effect of material migration while maintaining the benefits of the minimally-invasive delivery approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Quantity of substance

If the opening in the disc annulus is maintained for material delivery, then osteogenic substance can be implanted, but material can escape through the same opening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveosteogenic substance deliveryVSAvoidosteogenic substance migration
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier material serves as a mediator that allows the opening to remain open for osteogenic substance delivery while simultaneously preventing substance loss through migration. The barrier material is positioned to block the escape path while permitting controlled delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8162992B2Spinal fusion with osteogenic material and migration barrier
Publication Date: 2012.04.24 WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC INC
  • US8162992B2 patent drawing
  • US8162992B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are interbody spinal fusion methods, and kits useful therefor, in which a barrier material is interposed between an osteogenic material and an opening in the disc annulus providing access to the interbody space, wherein the barrier material is effective to inhibit migration of the osteogenic substance to the opening.