Spinal Implant Spacer Asymmetric Flexibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal implants only control motion between adjacent spinal segments but fail to alter the manner in which these segments move, limiting their effectiveness in achieving positive patient outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A spinal implant spacer member with a composite structure featuring sections of differing flexibility, which repositions the centers of rotation for flexion and extension by asymmetric deformation, and can be coupled with tethering systems to enhance stability and prevent displacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a simple spacer implant is used to control motion between spinal segments, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but it cannot alter the manner in which spinal segments move

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to alter movement mannerVSAvoidimplant structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer implant is divided into multiple sections with different flexibility characteristics. The first section has a first flexibility characteristic while the second section has a second flexibility characteristic, allowing each segment to contribute differently to motion control and movement pattern alteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the spacer are assigned different flexibility properties to create asymmetric deformation characteristics. This local differentiation enables the implant to selectively control and alter movement patterns in specific regions while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If a composite structure with different flexibility sections is used to alter movement patterns, then the ability to modify centers of rotation is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter of rotation repositioning capabilityVSAvoidcomposite structure manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer implant incorporates multiple sections with different flexibility characteristics that can be manufactured as a composite structure. This allows the implant to achieve asymmetric deformation and center of rotation repositioning capabilities while maintaining manufacturability through integrated composite design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If looped cables or straps are used to secure the implant, then the implant positioning is maintained and spinal flexion is limited, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant positioning stabilityVSAvoidtethering system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer sections are connected through connection pieces that integrate the tethering function into the spacer structure itself. This merging of functions reduces the need for separate complex tethering systems while maintaining positioning stability and limiting spinal flexion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The connection pieces serve multiple functions: they connect the spacer sections, provide tethering to limit flexion, and maintain positioning stability. This multi-functionality reduces overall device complexity by eliminating the need for separate components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The implant dynamically stabilizes the spinal motion segment, altering movement patterns and preventing dislodgement, thereby improving patient outcomes by modifying the centers of rotation and maintaining spinal stability.

Implementation Method 1

the configuration of the first and second sections provides an asymmetry of flexibility between anterior and posterior sides of the implant that provides preferential deformation and influences the repositioning of the centers of rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAsymmetric deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

at least a second section positioned adjacent to the first section and structured to be more flexible than the first section... the more flexible second section deforms preferentially

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlexible deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2278932B1Implants for inter-spinous process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment
Publication Date: 2014.08.13 WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC INC
  • EP2278932B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2278932B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3G
  • EP2278932B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~7

AI summary

An implant assembly for stabilizing a spinal motion segment includes a spacer which is at least partially flexible and positionable between adjacent spinous processes. The spacer member includes upper and lower surfaces structured to receive a respective adjacent one of the upper and lower spinous processes of the spinal motion segment and a body having flexibly distinctive first and second sections relative to one another configured to modify the manner of movement at the spinal motion segment.