Spinal Implant Insertion Tool With Asymmetric Drill Guide Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for inserting implants into the spine are complex and prone to errors, such as improper orientation and instability of the implant, leading to potential failure. Additionally, the need for multiple instruments and sizes complicates the surgical process and increases sterilization requirements.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising an insertion tool with asymmetrical engagement features and a drill guide that can be securely attached to the insertion tool, allowing for stable and precise placement of implants. The insertion tool includes a body with a distal portion and arms, and the drill guide has bores and an open-faced channel with engagement features that align with the insertion tool.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If symmetrical engagement features are used on the instrument and implant, then the implant can be engaged easily, but the implant may be engaged upside down leading to improper placement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement easeVSAvoidplacement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by providing engagement features on the implant that are asymmetric about the implant's longitudinal axis. Specifically, the implant includes a first engagement feature and a second engagement feature that differ from each other, while the instrument includes corresponding first and second engagement features that are asymmetrically positioned. This asymmetric configuration ensures that the implant can only be properly engaged in the correct orientation, preventing upside-down placement while maintaining ease of engagement through the complementary asymmetric features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Device complexity

If rotational restraint is not incorporated into the engagement features, then the instrument structure is simpler, but the implant may move or become unstable relative to the instrument

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument structureVSAvoidimplant stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric engagement features inherently provide rotational restraint without requiring additional complex mechanisms. The asymmetric geometry of the engagement features on both the implant and instrument creates a mechanical interlock that prevents rotation, thereby stabilizing the implant relative to the instrument while maintaining relatively simple instrument structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple standalone instruments are used for implant placement and screw insertion, then each function can be performed with specialized tools, but the number of instruments increases and sterilization requirements become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional specializationVSAvoidnumber of instruments
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the implant placement function and screw insertion guidance function into a single integrated instrument. The instrument includes both the asymmetric engagement features for securing the implant and the drill guide structure with bores for screw insertion. This combination eliminates the need for separate standalone instruments for each function, reducing the total number of instruments required while maintaining the specialized functions needed for proper implant placement and screw insertion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If the implant has limited orientation options during insertion, then the insertion process is simpler, but the possible orientations of the implant are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion simplicityVSAvoidorientation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric engagement features provide orientation flexibility by allowing the implant to be engaged in specific predetermined orientations that are determined by the asymmetric geometry. The instrument's asymmetric features guide the implant into the correct orientation during insertion, ensuring proper placement while maintaining insertion simplicity through the self-aligning nature of the asymmetric engagement features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS12303401B2Tritanium AL implants and instrumentation
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 K2M INC
  • US12303401B2 patent drawing
  • US12303401B2 patent drawing
  • US12303401B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, the present disclosure relates to a system that includes an insertion tool and a drill guide. The insertion tool includes a body with a distal portion and a distal end. The body has a first engagement feature extending longitudinally along the distal portion and two arms extending longitudinally from the distal end of the body. The drill guide includes two bores and an open faced channel therebetween. The open faced channel includes a second engagement feature slidably engageable with the first engagement feature on the body of the insertion tool. The two bores are adapted for the disposal of a fastener driver tool therethrough.