Spinal Implant Suitability Assessment With Virtual Loading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for assessing spinal column integrity and suitability of spinal implants are subjective, time-consuming, and lack objective data for determining the risk of iatrogenic instability and implant effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A system using image data to virtually simulate the insertion of spinal implants, performing loading simulations to assess suitability based on patient-specific bony anatomy properties, and adjusting parameters for optimal implant placement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods relying on surgeon's experience and judgment are used to assess spinal column integrity, then the assessment can be performed with existing knowledge, but the method is time-consuming, subjective, and lacks objective data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment objectivityVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the patient's spinal anatomy using image data (CT or MRI scans) to build a computational model. This digital twin allows objective simulation and analysis of spinal column integrity without requiring physical manipulation or prolonged clinical assessment, thereby providing precise, objective measurements while reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces subjective human judgment and manual assessment methods with computational mechanics simulations. By using finite element analysis and other mechanical modeling techniques on the virtual spinal model, the system objectively quantifies spinal column integrity, implant suitability, and iatrogenic instability risk, eliminating the time-consuming and subjective nature of conventional surgeon-based assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If spinal decompression procedures are performed to relieve spinal compression, then neural element compression is reduced, but the integrity and stability of the spinal column may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural compressionVSAvoidspinal column stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational simulations before the actual decompression surgery. The system evaluates multiple surgical scenarios in silico, predicting how different decompression approaches will affect both neural element relief and spinal column stability. This allows surgeons to plan procedures that maximize decompression benefits while minimizing stability compromise through informed decision-making based on simulation results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the computational model provides quantitative predictions about spinal stability following decompression. These predictions feed back into the surgical planning process, allowing adjustment of the decompression strategy to maintain spinal column integrity while achieving neural element relief, thus balancing the conflicting objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If spinal fusion or implant procedures are used to improve spinal column integrity, then spinal stability is enhanced, but the risk of iatrogenic instability and implant failure remains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal column stabilityVSAvoidimplant effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the computational model to evaluate how different implant characteristics (size, material, placement trajectory, fixation method) affect both spinal stability and implant reliability. By systematically varying these parameters in simulations, the system identifies optimal implant configurations that maximize stability enhancement while minimizing the risk of iatrogenic instability and implant failure for each patient's specific anatomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12433678B2Devices, methods, and systems for assessing suitability of spinal implants
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC INC
  • US12433678B2 patent drawing
  • US12433678B2 patent drawing
  • US12433678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for assessing spinal implants includes at least one processor, and a memory storing instructions for execution by the at least one processor that, when executed, cause the at least one processor to receive first image data of a spinal column of a patient, determine, based on the first image data, a property of first bony anatomy in at least a first portion of the spinal column, determine, based on the property of the first bony anatomy, an initial screw trajectory for inserting a screw into the spinal column, virtually insert the screw along the initial screw trajectory using the first image data to generate modified first image data, perform an initial loading simulation for the virtually inserted screw using the modified first image data, and determine, based on the initial loading simulation, a suitability of the initial screw trajectory for implanting the screw into the spinal column.