Structurally encoded spinal implant identification via imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical implant devices lack an effective identification system, leading to poor record-keeping and potential medical errors, and there is a need for a robust system to track and manage implants, particularly due to the lack of a common system for manufacturers, distributors, and healthcare facilities.

Innovation Solution

The development of structurally encoded implant devices with readable portions that include modifications such as arrays of holes, notches, or variations in density, allowing identification via medical imaging modalities like x-ray, fluoroscopy, and MRI, and a database system to access and display associated information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional implant identification methods are used, then implant tracking is possible, but the system lacks robustness and common standards across manufacturers and healthcare facilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant identification reliabilityVSAvoidsystem compatibility across manufacturers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a standardized identification system that can be used across different manufacturers, distributors, and healthcare facilities. The structurally encoded identification method serves as a universal language for implant tracking, replacing fragmented manufacturer-specific systems with a common standard that enhances both reliability and adaptability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If implant information is recorded manually, then some tracking data is captured, but record accuracy and accessibility are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant record completenessVSAvoidrecord accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the implant device itself to carry and communicate its identification information through structural encoding. The implant's own structure serves as the identification medium, eliminating reliance on external manual recording systems and thereby improving both information completeness and accuracy automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If no post-implantation identification system is used, then implantation is simpler, but medical errors increase due to poor record keeping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplantation simplicityVSAvoidmedical error reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by incorporating the identification encoding into the implant structure during manufacturing, before implantation occurs. This pre-established identification system requires no additional steps during the implantation procedure itself, maintaining surgical simplicity while ensuring reliable post-implantation tracking and error prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Quantity of substance

If detailed implant information is stored externally, then comprehensive tracking is possible, but data accessibility and retrieval efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant data volumeVSAvoiddata retrieval time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the nested doll principle by embedding the identification information directly within the implant's structural encoding. The identification data is nested within the physical structure of the implant itself, allowing immediate access and retrieval without requiring external database queries, thereby reducing data retrieval time while maintaining comprehensive tracking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables accurate and efficient identification of implant devices post-implantation, reducing medical errors and facilitating better tracking and management of implants, including data storage and error correction, thereby enhancing patient safety and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The indicia may be discernible by any medical imaging modality, such as at least one of x-ray, fluoroscopy, computed tomography, electromagnetic radiation, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

The indicia may be discernible by any medical imaging modality, such as at least one of x-ray, fluoroscopy, computed tomography, electromagnetic radiation, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10675122B2Structurally encoded spinal implant device
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 SECOM HOLDINGS LLC
  • US10675122B2 patent drawing
  • US10675122B2 patent drawing
  • US10675122B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spinal implant device identifiable after implantation comprises an outer cage member and an implant body. The implant body is disposed between a first vertebra end and a second vertebra end of the outer cage and defines a plurality of planes. Each of the planes comprises separately readable indicia such that the indicia are discernible by at least one of x-ray, fluoroscopy, computed tomography, electromagnetic radiation, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging.