Spinal Interbody Devices with Gradient Porosity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing orthopedic implants, such as spinal fusion cages, face challenges in achieving secure fixation to bone, visualizing the implant via radiographic imagery, and maintaining durability while promoting bone ingrowth and reducing stress shielding.

Innovation Solution

The development of spinal interbody devices (IBDs) with optimized features, including varying porosities, tissue through-channels, bioactive substance integration, and composite-like structures with nonporous and porous portions, to enhance fixation, visualization, and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If porous structures are used to encourage bone growth into the implant, then bone ingrowth is improved, but the implant becomes more difficult to visualize via radiographic imagery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone ingrowthVSAvoidradiographic visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a gradient porosity structure where the proximal portion has lower porosity (30-60%) for better radiographic visibility and structural integrity, while the distal portion has higher porosity (60-90%) to maximize bone ingrowth. This spatial variation in porosity allows different regions to serve different functions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The implant combines porous and non-porous portions in a single composite structure. The non-porous proximal portion provides radiographic contrast and structural support, while the porous distal portion facilitates bone ingrowth. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by integrating materials with opposing properties in a unified device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If graft windows are provided for bone graft packing, then bone growth into the implant is improved, but the implant's structural strength is reduced due to concentration of loads on smaller areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone growthVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the need for separate graft windows by incorporating porous structures directly into the implant body. This eliminates the need for distinct window openings while maintaining bone ingrowth capability, thereby preserving structural integrity and distributing loads more evenly across the implant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the bone graft function directly into the implant structure by integrating porous regions that serve as both structural components and bone ingrowth pathways. This consolidation eliminates the separation between graft delivery and structural support functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If the implant is made stiffer to provide structural strength, then durability is improved, but stress shielding increases which limits bone ingrowth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidbone ingrowth
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a gradient porosity structure where the proximal portion has lower porosity (30-60%) for better radiographic visibility and structural integrity, while the distal portion has higher porosity (60-90%) to maximize bone ingrowth. This spatial variation in porosity allows different regions to serve different functions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes porous materials with controlled porosity gradients to reduce overall implant stiffness while maintaining local structural strength. The porous distal portion (60-90% porosity) reduces stress shielding and promotes bone ingrowth, while the less porous proximal portion (30-60% porosity) maintains structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Data Source

PatentUS20250195234A1Interbody Implants and Optimization Features Thereof
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 VB SPINE LLC
  • US20250195234A1 patent drawing
  • US20250195234A1 patent drawing
  • US20250195234A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of making a spinal implant may include obtaining images of a vertebra defining a disc space of a patient, identifying a number of porous sections in an implant for implantation in the disc space, and producing the implant including the identified number of porous sections.