Expandable Spinal Implant Lamina Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Interspinous process bone implants used for spinal stenosis and fusion procedures face challenges such as difficulty in mechanical fixation, erosion of adjacent bone, and fracture of the spinous process due to their thin and weak nature, which can lead to pain and bone resorption issues.

Innovation Solution

A spinal implant designed for engagement with lamina bone, which is stronger and more rigid than spinous processes, featuring an expandable retaining member that applies distracting force to reduce soft tissue protrusion into the spinal canal and foramen, thereby transferring load away from the spinous process and reducing the risk of fracture and bone resorption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If interspinous process bone implants are used to alleviate spinal stenosis pain, then pain relief is achieved, but the spinous process may fracture due to its thin and weak nature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain relief effectivenessVSAvoidspinous process strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an interspinous spacer as an intermediary device that is inserted into the interspinous space and expanded to provide mechanical support. This spacer acts as a mediator between the spinous processes, distributing loads and reducing stress on the fragile spinous processes while maintaining the pain relief function. The spacer includes expansion mechanisms that allow it to be inserted in a compressed state and then expanded to provide stable support without requiring fixation to the spinous processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If interspinous process bone implants are used to maintain intervertebral space, then space maintenance is achieved, but mechanical fixation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintervertebral space maintenanceVSAvoidmechanical fixation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic expansion mechanism where the spacer is inserted in a compressed, low-profile state that facilitates easy placement through minimal surgical exposure. Once positioned, the spacer is expanded to its full size to provide stable intervertebral space maintenance. The expansion can be achieved through various mechanisms including balloon inflation, mechanical expansion elements, or shape memory materials that respond to temperature or chemical changes. This dynamic approach allows the device to transition from an easy-to-insert state to a stable, load-bearing state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If interspinous process bone implants are used to redirect pressure away from foramina, then pain relief is achieved, but erosion of adjacent bone occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain relief effectivenessVSAvoidbone erosion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the spacer material properties to address bone erosion. The spacer is made from materials with specific mechanical properties including appropriate hardness, elasticity, and stress distribution characteristics. These material parameters are selected to distribute pressures evenly across the interspinous space, avoiding concentration of forces that could erode adjacent bone. The material may also have osteoconductive or osteoinductive properties to promote healthy bone remodeling rather than erosion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9622872B2Intervertebral spinal implant and method
Publication Date: 2017.04.18 WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC INC
  • US9622872B2 patent drawing
  • US9622872B2 patent drawing
  • US9622872B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spinal implant is provided. The spinal implant comprises a body configured for implantation between two adjacent vertebrae, and comprises a retaining member movable between a first position where the retaining member is in an unexpanded configuration and a second position where the retaining member is in an expanded configuration. The retaining member comprises a tissue contacting surface configured to engage a lamina of at least one of the adjacent vertebrae.