Spinal Implant Lock Mechanism for Secure Rod Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal implant delivery systems face challenges in securely engaging and disengaging implants during surgical procedures, particularly in maintaining stability and preventing unintentional disengagement under normal use.

Innovation Solution

The system incorporates a lock mechanism with spring-loaded buttons and a sliding sleeve that automatically engages or disengages with slots in the implant support, ensuring secure attachment and preventing unintentional disengagement, along with a quick release mechanism for easy manipulation of the reducer and spinal rod.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple engagement mechanism is used for the reducer and spinal rod, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to risk of unintentional disengagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manipulationVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The lock mechanism features spring-loaded buttons that automatically engage with slots on the spinal rod when the reducer is inserted, and automatically disengage when the rod is removed. The spring force provides automatic locking without requiring additional fastening steps, while still maintaining secure engagement during surgical procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The lock mechanism acts as an intermediary between the reducer and spinal rod, providing a controlled engagement and disengagement interface. The spring-loaded buttons with slots create a mechanical intermediary system that ensures proper alignment and secure connection while allowing easy manipulation when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a secure lock mechanism is implemented to prevent unintentional disengagement, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lock mechanism is segmented into discrete functional components: spring-loaded buttons, slots, and engagement surfaces. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently while contributing to the overall security of the connection, making the complex mechanism easier to manufacture and assemble.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a complex multi-step locking process, the design inverts the approach by using spring-loaded buttons that naturally engage and lock automatically. The security feature works passively through spring force rather than requiring active engagement steps, simplifying the user interaction while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides secure engagement and disengagement of implants, maintaining stability during surgical procedures and allowing for efficient manipulation of the reducer and spinal rod, enhancing the precision and safety of spinal implant delivery.

Implementation Method 1

spring-loaded buttons and a sliding sleeve that automatically engages or disengages with slots

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3033017B1Spinal implant system
Publication Date: 2020.05.13 WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC INC
  • EP3033017B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3033017B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3033017B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An implant support comprises a first portion defining a longitudinal axis and a second portion including at least one arm extending from the first portion. The at least one arm includes a part. An extension is engageable with the at least one arm to move the at least one arm between a first position and a second position such that the part is disposed to releasably engage an implant. A lock is disposed with the first portion and connected with the extension. The lock is biased from a first configuration to a second configuration to engage the first portion and resist disengagement of the at least one arm from the second position. Systems and methods of use are disclosed.