Spinal Cord Stimulation Midline Localization via Peripheral EMG Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal cord stimulation therapies face challenges in determining effective stimulation parameters due to uncertainties in electrode placement and the anatomical alignment of neuroanatomy, which limits the customization and effectiveness of treatment for chronic pain management.

Innovation Solution

A technique that uses peripheral electrodes in conjunction with spinal electrodes to measure and calculate the relative position of spinal electrodes to a physiological midline, allowing for the precise determination of the physiological midline location and optimizing electrode placement for improved stimulation therapy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional spinal cord stimulation therapy is used with standard electrode placement, then the treatment can be administered, but the effectiveness is limited due to uncertainties in electrode placement and anatomical alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of stimulation therapyVSAvoidaccuracy of electrode placement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical/anatomical landmark-based electrode placement with a physiological signal-based method. By using EMG signals from peripheral muscles as a reference, the system substitutes the mechanical alignment process with an electrophysiological measurement approach, allowing precise identification of the physiological midline without relying on anatomical landmarks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback by continuously monitoring EMG signals from peripheral muscles and using this information to determine the relative position of spinal electrodes to the physiological midline. The measured EMG signal amplitudes provide feedback that is processed to calculate electrode positioning accuracy, enabling real-time assessment and adjustment of electrode placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If anatomical landmarks are used to determine midline for electrode placement, then the procedure is simple, but the alignment with physiological midline is inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of placement procedureVSAvoidaccuracy of midline alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces EMG signals from peripheral muscles as an intermediary reference to bridge the gap between simple anatomical landmarks and precise physiological midline. The EMG signals serve as a mediator that translates easily obtainable peripheral measurements into accurate information about spinal electrode positioning relative to the physiological midline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from two-dimensional anatomical surface landmarks to a functional physiological dimension by using EMG signal amplitudes. This adds a functional layer of measurement that correlates peripheral muscle activity with central spinal cord electrode positioning, enabling more accurate midline identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3439735B1System to estimate the location of a spinal cord physiological midline
Publication Date: 2021.07.07 BOSTON SCI NEUROMODULATION CORP
  • EP3439735B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3439735B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3439735B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Techniques for determining the location of a physiological midline are disclosed. A first technique evaluates the response to stimulation of spinal electrodes at peripheral electrodes on different sides of the body. In this technique, a spinal electrode's position relative to a physiological midline is determined based on a relationship between responses to its stimulation observed on different sides of the body. A second technique evaluates the response of spinal electrodes to stimulation of peripheral electrodes on different sides of the body. In this technique, a spinal electrode's position relative to a physiological midline is determined based on the different responses that it observes to stimulation on different sides of the body.