AI Candidate Scoring for Spinal Neuromodulation Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing treatments for chronic back pain are costly, addictive, temporary, ineffective, or require long recovery times, and do not provide adequate relief for the majority of patients, with a small percentage being surgically eligible, and there is a lack of reliable methods to identify patients likely to respond favorably to spinal neuromodulation procedures.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a combination of indicators, including imaging and biomarker analysis, to generate an objective score predicting the likelihood of a favorable response to spinal neuromodulation procedures like basivertebral nerve ablation, utilizing artificial intelligence techniques and trained algorithms to analyze MRI, CT, and other imaging modalities for vertebral endplate characteristics and biomarkers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing treatments for chronic back pain are used, then patients receive conventional therapy, but treatment effectiveness is low and recovery time is long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of suitable candidates using AI analysis of imaging and biomarker data before treatment. This preliminary screening ensures that only patients with high probability of favorable response undergo spinal neuromodulation, thereby improving overall treatment effectiveness while reducing unnecessary recovery time for unsuitable candidates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses automated AI algorithms to analyze imaging data and biomarkers, generating objective scores and treatment recommendations without requiring extensive manual clinical assessment. This self-service approach accelerates the evaluation process, reducing the time from diagnosis to treatment decision while maintaining high reliability through algorithmic consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If spinal neuromodulation procedures are performed without candidate identification, then treatment may be provided, but false positives and negatives increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecandidate identification accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assessment system is segmented into distinct analytical components: imaging data analysis, biomarker analysis, AI-based score generation, and treatment recommendation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, improving measurement precision through specialized analysis while managing overall system complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The AI-based assessment system serves multiple functions: it analyzes diverse imaging modalities (MRI, CT, X-ray), processes various biomarker types, generates predictive scores, and provides treatment recommendations. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate assessment tools into a single unified system, improving precision without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If comprehensive imaging and biomarker analysis is performed, then treatment accuracy improves, but analysis complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment prediction accuracyVSAvoidanalysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AI algorithm acts as an intermediary that processes complex imaging and biomarker data, transforming multifaceted input information into a simplified objective score and clear treatment recommendation. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of comprehensive analysis internally while presenting simplified, actionable output to clinicians, thereby improving prediction accuracy without exposing the full complexity of the analysis system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12573045B2Candidate determination for spinal neuromodulation
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 RELIEVANT MEDSYSTEMS INC
  • US12573045B2 patent drawing
  • US12573045B2 patent drawing
  • US12573045B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are various implementations of systems and methods for determining likelihood of a patient favorably responding to a neuromodulation procedure based on a quantitative or objective score or determination based on a plurality of indicators of pain (e.g., chronic low back pain stemming from one or more vertebral bodies or vertebral endplates of a patient). The systems and methods may involve application of artificial intelligence techniques (e.g., trained algorithms, machine learning or deep learning algorithms, and/or trained neural networks).