Spinal Orthosis Lumbar Assembly Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinal orthoses are bulky, difficult to don and doff, and often fail to provide consistent tension, which can negatively affect back extensor strength and long-term outcomes for individuals with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis, and may not adequately address the need for improved back muscle strength and posture correction.

Innovation Solution

A spinal orthosis design featuring a comfortable, low-profile lumbar assembly with a rigid posterior frame and a strapping system that allows effortless use, providing consistent donning and immobilization, with adjustable straps and elastic components to resist movement and pull the spine into a corrective position, thereby reducing pain and improving mobility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional spinal orthoses are used to provide compression and support, then spinal stability and fracture protection are improved, but the device becomes bulky and difficult to don and doff

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal stabilityVSAvoidease of donning and doffing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The orthosis is divided into a lumbar assembly and a separate posterior frame assembly that can be independently assembled and adjusted. This segmentation allows the device to be more manageable and easier to don/doff while maintaining spinal stability through the modular construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The orthosis incorporates adjustable straps and flexible positioning mechanisms that allow the device to adapt dynamically to the wearer's body and movement needs. This dynamic design maintains compression and support while improving ease of operation through simple adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If conventional spinal orthoses are used to immobilize the spine, then fracture protection is improved, but back extensor strength deteriorates due to long-term immobilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture protectionVSAvoidback extensor strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The orthosis provides partial immobilization rather than complete rigidity, allowing controlled movement that maintains fracture protection while preventing the muscle atrophy associated with complete immobilization. The flexible design permits necessary muscle engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The orthosis allows for adjustable compression levels and positioning parameters that can be modified over time as the patient's condition improves. This progressive adjustment maintains fracture protection while gradually increasing back extensor strength through controlled movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If conventional spinal orthoses are used to correct posture, then spinal alignment is improved, but the device fails to provide consistent tension

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal alignmentVSAvoidtension consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The orthosis incorporates feedback mechanisms through adjustable straps and positioning systems that allow the wearer or clinician to monitor and adjust tension levels. This ensures consistent tension is maintained for proper spinal alignment while allowing adjustments as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic adjustment capabilities of the orthosis allow tension to be optimized and maintained consistently throughout wear. The flexible design adapts to movement while maintaining appropriate compression and alignment forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid framework orthosis is used to treat scoliosis, then spinal deformity correction is improved, but device complexity and bulk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal deformity correctionVSAvoidorthosis structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The orthosis uses flexible positioning elements and straps rather than rigid frameworks to achieve spinal alignment and deformity correction. This flexible approach maintains correction effectiveness while significantly reducing device complexity and bulk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The orthosis achieves deformity correction through adjustable parameter settings in the strap system and positioning mechanisms rather than fixed rigid structures. This allows effective correction with a simpler, more adaptable device design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The spinal orthosis effectively reduces pain and functional disability, enhances mobility, and encourages wearer compliance by providing comfortable and efficient compression, facilitating pain relief and improved posture in individuals with vertebral fractures from L5 to T4, and can be adapted for conditions like scoliosis.

Implementation Method 1

An elastic strap has a first end secured to the spinal frame and a second end adjustably securing to the lumbar assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12186226B2Spinal orthosis
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 OSSUR HF
  • US12186226B2 patent drawing
  • US12186226B2 patent drawing
  • US12186226B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spinal orthosis has an elongate and substantially rigid spinal frame having upper, middle and lower portions, and a lumbar assembly connected to the lower portion of the spinal frame. A strap assembly secures to an upper portion of the spinal frame and is adjustably secured to the lumbar assembly. An elastic strap has a first end secured to the spinal frame and a second end adjustably securing to the lumbar assembly.