Spinal Prosthesis Design for Facet Joint Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current artificial disc prostheses exacerbate facet joint degeneration due to increased load and motion, leading to reduced pain-free intervals and clinical success in treating degenerative spine disease, as they fail to replicate natural spinal motion and distribute stress effectively.

Innovation Solution

The development of orthopedic prostheses that replicate physiological movement, limit rotational movement, and distract facet joints to reduce aberrant contact, along with unique attachment methods and designs that minimize stress on facet joints, such as spring-loaded and keel-based systems, to maintain spinal mobility and slow facet joint degeneration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If artificial disc prosthesis are used to replace degenerated discs, then spinal mobility is preserved, but facet joint degeneration accelerates due to increased load and motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal mobilityVSAvoidfacet joint degeneration
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis employs different materials and structural properties in different regions: the central disc portion uses mobile materials to preserve spinal motion, while the peripheral regions incorporate stress-shielding features and facet joint distractions to protect against degeneration. The asymmetric design provides localized stress distribution that mimics natural disc function while protecting facet joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The prosthesis incorporates dynamic elements including mobile disc portions that allow controlled motion, spring-loaded mechanisms that adapt to loading conditions, and adjustable facet joint distractions that respond to movement. This dynamic design enables the prosthesis to preserve spinal mobility while adapting to reduce facet joint stress during various motion states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If complete immobilization and bony fusion are performed, then pain from degenerative disc disease is relieved, but the load on adjacent spinal segments increases and accelerates their degeneration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain reliefVSAvoidadjacent segment degeneration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis divides the spinal segment into functionally independent portions: a mobile central disc portion that maintains motion, and peripheral stress-shielding regions that protect adjacent segments. This segmentation allows pain relief at the treated level while preserving motion and reducing load transmission to adjacent segments, preventing the cascade of degeneration that occurs with complete fusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The prosthesis acts as an intermediary structure between adjacent spinal segments, providing stress-shielding features and facet joint distractions that mediate the mechanical interaction. This intermediary design relieves pain at the treated level while protecting adjacent segments from excessive load, preventing the need for extension of fusion to neighboring levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If artificial disc prosthesis increase rotational freedom, then spinal motion is restored, but facet joint stress increases leading to faster joint degeneration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal motion restorationVSAvoidfacet joint stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis provides localized rotational freedom in the central disc region while constraining or distracting the peripheral facet joints. The asymmetric design allows motion where needed while applying stress-shielding features and facet joint distractions at locations where motion would increase stress, creating local quality variations that balance motion restoration with stress reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The prosthesis incorporates dynamic facet joint distractions that adjust to motion conditions, and spring-loaded mechanisms that modulate stress transmission. These dynamic features allow the prosthesis to restore spinal motion while adaptively reducing facet joint stress during various motion states, preventing the accelerated degeneration that occurs with rigid rotational freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8771355B2Inter-vertebral disc motion devices and methods of use
Publication Date: 2014.07.08 ABDOU M S
  • US8771355B2 patent drawing
  • US8771355B2 patent drawing
  • US8771355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mobile device is adapted to at least partially replace the motion characteristics of a natural inter-vertebral disc positioned in a disc space. In an embodiment, a receptacle is coupled to the bearing surface. The receptacle is adapted to accept an implantable material without the removal of the bearing surface, wherein the implantable material contacts the abutment surface of each of the vertebral bodies adjacent to the disc space and leads to fusion and immobilization of two vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space.