Robotic Spinal Screw Placement with Haptic Feedback and Motion Compensation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current robotic systems for spinal surgeries face challenges in achieving precise screw placement due to human error, limited workspace, and compatibility with operating room equipment, leading to inaccuracies and increased risk of screw misplacement.
Innovation Solution
A robotic system with a passive structure and navigation software that assists surgeons by registering patient position, positioning the robot within the workspace, and automatically compensating for vertebral movements, while providing haptic feedback to prevent tool deviation from planned trajectories.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If robotic systems are used for spinal surgeries, then screw placement precision is improved, but device complexity and integration difficulty with operating room equipment increase
Solution Approach 1:
The robotic system is designed with a universal passive structure that can interface with standard operating room equipment and support multiple surgical procedures. The system integrates navigation software, robotic positioning, and haptic feedback within a unified platform that maintains compatibility with existing surgical tools and imaging systems, thereby reducing integration complexity while preserving precision.
2Manufacturing precision
If real-time compensation for patient movements is implemented, then screw placement accuracy is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system employs real-time feedback mechanisms where navigation software continuously monitors patient position and robotic tool location. Haptic feedback devices provide tactile information to the surgeon about tool position relative to the screw trajectory. This closed-loop feedback enables automatic compensation for patient movements while keeping the control architecture manageable through intuitive surgeon-input-driven operations.
3Reliability
If haptic feedback is provided to prevent tool deviation, then surgical safety is improved, but device complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
Haptic feedback devices are integrated into the robotic system to provide real-time tactile information to the surgeon about tool position and trajectory deviation. This feedback mechanism enhances surgical safety by alerting the surgeon to potential errors before they occur, while the system maintains relatively simple architecture by building upon existing robotic and navigation infrastructure.
4Volume of moving object
If passive structure positioning is used, then workspace coverage is improved, but positioning speed and automation level decrease
Solution Approach 1:
The passive structure is designed with dynamic positioning capabilities that allow the robotic arm to be manually positioned by the surgeon when needed, while automatically returning to predefined positions or following navigation guidance during automated operations. This dynamic switching between manual and automated modes enables comprehensive workspace coverage while maintaining high positioning speed through automated features when appropriate.
Data Source
AI summary
The present invention relates to a method, such as a surgical method for assisting a surgeon for placing screws in the spine using a robot attached to a passive structure. The present invention also related to a method, such as a surgical method for assisting a surgeon for removing volumes in the body of a patient using a robot attached to a passive structure and to a device to carry out said methods. The present invention further concerns a device suitable to carry out the methods according to the present invention.


