Spinal Spacer Cam Actuator Deployment Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal stabilization technologies, such as pedicle screw-based systems and interspinous spacers, are invasive, prone to implant migration, and do not adequately maintain natural spinal biomechanics, leading to reduced mobility and potential pseudarthrosis.

Innovation Solution

A spinal spacer device with a hook member and post system that includes a cam surface and actuator, allowing for deployment and stabilization between vertebrae with reduced tissue disruption, featuring a stowed and deployed configuration to minimize invasiveness and prevent migration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pedicle screw-based systems are used for spinal stabilization, then stabilization effectiveness is improved, but surgical invasiveness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization effectivenessVSAvoidsurgical invasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the stabilization function from the complex pedicle screw system and concentrates it into a simple interspinous spacer device. The spacer is inserted through a small posterior incision between the spinous processes, avoiding the need for pedicle screw insertion and extensive tissue dissection, thus reducing surgical invasiveness while maintaining stabilization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The device is segmented into distinct functional components: a body portion that engages with the spinous processes, a spacer element that maintains spacing between vertebrae, and a wire or suture that secures the device. This segmentation allows for simplified implantation while achieving the same stabilization goal as pedicle screws.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If hard or solid interspinous spacers are used, then structural stability is improved, but tissue disruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidtissue disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer element is designed with differentiated local properties: the body portion is made of rigid material to provide structural stability and engage with spinous processes, while the spacer element itself can be made of softer, more compliant material to reduce tissue disruption during insertion and while maintaining the necessary spacing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If compliant interspinous spacers are used, then tissue disruption is reduced, but implant migration susceptibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue disruptionVSAvoidimplant migration resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into two segments with different material properties: the body portion is rigid to prevent migration and provide anchorage, while the spacer element can be compliant to reduce tissue disruption. This segmentation allows each part to fulfill its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wire or suture acts as an intermediary element that connects the rigid body portion to the compliant spacer element, allowing the spacer to be compliant enough to reduce tissue disruption while the wire provides the necessary retention to prevent migration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If fusion surgery is performed, then pain relief is improved, but range of motion decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain reliefVSAvoidrange of motion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of fusing the vertebrae (which eliminates motion), the invention uses the interspinous spacer to maintain and preserve the natural motion between vertebrae. The spacer provides pain relief by offloading the disc while allowing the spine to continue moving naturally, converting the harmful effect of disc degeneration into a beneficial preservation of motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS9186186B2Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods
Publication Date: 2015.11.17 BOSTON SCI NEUROMODULATION CORP
  • US9186186B2 patent drawing
  • US9186186B2 patent drawing
  • US9186186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Spinal spacers for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods are disclosed. A device in accordance with a particular embodiment includes a hook member having a hook positioned to extend in a first direction, a post carried by the hook member and extending axially in a second direction transverse to the first direction, and a cam surface carried by the hook member. An actuator device is movably engaged with the post, and a spinal spacer is pivotably coupled to one of the actuator device and the post. The spinal spacer is axially movable relative to the hook member and has a spacing element in contact with the cam surface to pivot outwardly away from the post as the actuator device moves.