Spinal Tether Locking Mechanism with Compliance Member

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal implants for treating discogenic pain and related conditions are invasive, irreversible, and prone to mechanical failure due to uneven force distribution and complex assembly, leading to unreliable and less effective pain relief.

Innovation Solution

A fastening mechanism and method for securely locking a tether to restrict spinal flexion using a constraint device with a clamp body and fastener element, providing adjustable resistance to flexion and extension, and featuring a compliance member to distribute forces evenly, allowing for less invasive and reversible implantation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current spinal implants are used to restrict spinal flexion, then pain relief is provided, but the implants are invasive and irreversible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain relief reliabilityVSAvoidimplantation invasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tether is made adjustable and reversible, allowing dynamic modification of the implantation. The fastening mechanism enables the tether to be tightened or loosened and completely removed if needed, transforming the static, irreversible implant into a dynamic, reversible system that maintains pain relief while reducing invasiveness concerns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The implant allows adjustment of the tether tension and positioning parameters post-implantation. The fastening mechanism enables modification of the tether's mechanical properties and position, allowing optimization of pain relief while minimizing initial invasiveness through reversible adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If current spinal implants are used to restrict spinal flexion, then motion restriction is achieved, but mechanical failure occurs due to uneven force distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal segment stabilizationVSAvoidmechanical failure resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance member is positioned specifically at the fastening point where force concentration occurs. This local compliance element distributes the mechanical load evenly across the tether and fastening mechanism, preventing stress concentration and reducing the risk of mechanical failure while maintaining spinal segment stabilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The compliance member acts as a pre-installed cushioning element that absorbs and distributes mechanical forces before they can cause damage. By placing this compliant element at the critical fastening point, the system preemptively protects against uneven force distribution and potential mechanical failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Stability of the object's composition

If current spinal implants are used to restrict spinal flexion, then spinal segment stabilization is provided, but the implants are irreversible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal segment stabilizationVSAvoidreversibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening mechanism creates a dynamic connection between the tether and anchor that can be easily adjusted or completely reversed. This allows the spinal segment stabilization to be maintained initially, then modified or removed if needed, providing both stability and reversibility that were previously contradictory

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If complex assembly mechanisms are used in spinal implants, then secure locking is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetether locking reliabilityVSAvoidfastening mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening mechanism extracts the essential function of secure locking from a complex multi-component system and implements it through a simple, integrated design. The fastening element and compliance member work together as a unified, minimally complex system that achieves reliable tether locking without the need for complex assembly mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP2296567B1Apparatus for locking a band
Publication Date: 2014.03.12 EMPIRICAL SPINE INC
  • EP2296567B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2296567B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2296567B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Fastening mechanisms for releasably locking a tether are provided. The mechanisms find application with orthopedic internal-fixation implants and make the implants more reliable and their implantation less invasive. A method for releasably locking a tether comprises advancing the tether through a tether aperture in a clamp body. The tether enters the tether aperture in a first plane and exits in a second plane generally transverse to the first plane. Positioning a fastener element in a fastener aperture in the clamp body captures the tether between the clamp body and the fastener element thereby releasably locking the tether in position relative to the clamp body.